PANews reported on November 17th that DeFi expert Kenshin stated that Robinhood's tokenized US stocks and ETFs on Arbitrum continue to expand rapidly. As of now: Number of tokenized assets: 780 Total tokenized value: Over $7.43 million Stocks: $5.1 million ETF: $1.84 million Goods: $286,000 Regarding cumulative on-chain activity: Total mint production has exceeded US$19.9 million. The total amount burned reached $11.9 million. The poster stated that this means Robinhood is using Arbitrum as the core settlement infrastructure for its regulated equity products, and that an active market has emerged in less than five months, indicating a significant acceleration in the trend of on-chain asset tokenization.PANews reported on November 17th that DeFi expert Kenshin stated that Robinhood's tokenized US stocks and ETFs on Arbitrum continue to expand rapidly. As of now: Number of tokenized assets: 780 Total tokenized value: Over $7.43 million Stocks: $5.1 million ETF: $1.84 million Goods: $286,000 Regarding cumulative on-chain activity: Total mint production has exceeded US$19.9 million. The total amount burned reached $11.9 million. The poster stated that this means Robinhood is using Arbitrum as the core settlement infrastructure for its regulated equity products, and that an active market has emerged in less than five months, indicating a significant acceleration in the trend of on-chain asset tokenization.

Robinhood's tokenized assets on Arbitrum have increased to 780, with a total value exceeding $7.43 million.

2025/11/17 12:58

PANews reported on November 17th that DeFi expert Kenshin stated that Robinhood's tokenized US stocks and ETFs on Arbitrum continue to expand rapidly. As of now:

  • Number of tokenized assets: 780

  • Total tokenized value: Over $7.43 million

    • Stocks: $5.1 million

    • ETF: $1.84 million

    • Goods: $286,000

Regarding cumulative on-chain activity:

  • Total mint production has exceeded US$19.9 million.

  • The total amount burned reached $11.9 million.

The poster stated that this means Robinhood is using Arbitrum as the core settlement infrastructure for its regulated equity products, and that an active market has emerged in less than five months, indicating a significant acceleration in the trend of on-chain asset tokenization.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Fat Finger Causes Whale to Lose $6M in USDA Swap

Fat Finger Causes Whale to Lose $6M in USDA Swap

The post Fat Finger Causes Whale to Lose $6M in USDA Swap appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A dormant Cardano wallet just vaporized more than $6 million in a single swap after executing one of the most extreme slippage events the network has seen this year. The holder — whose address had not shown any activity since September 2020 — reappeared on-chain Sunday and swapped 14.4 million ADA (worth roughly $6.9 million) for just 847,695 USDA, a little-known Cardano-native dollar stablecoin. The trade was first flagged by on-chain investigator ZachXBT in their Telegram channel. (ZachXBT) The user effectively paid more than $8 per USDA at execution — a disastrous price, given that USDA is supposed to be pegged near $1 and has a market cap of only around $10.6 million. The transaction instantly wiped out around $6.05 million in value. With only thin on-chain depth available, the order ripped the stablecoin’s price to nearly $1.26 on Cardano DEXs, according to CoinGecko. USDA briefly floated above peg before retracing to roughly $1.04, as liquidity normalized once the whale-sized order finished clearing. The address had no prior history with USDA, making it unclear whether the user misclicked, confused the stablecoin ticker, or assumed liquidity would hold for a market-order style swap. A mistaken ticker choice is plausible — USDA is not widely traded, and the Cardano ecosystem has multiple USD-denominated assets with similar tickers. The episode is a textbook example of why large traders avoid illiquid pools and never route size through automated market makers without slippage checks. Even a few million dollars in ADA can overwhelm decentralized liquidity if the opposing side of the pool is barely funded. In previous cycles, traders have repeatedly lost seven-figures due to wrong tickers, zero-liquidity pools, or overly aggressive market orders executed through aggregators. On Cardano, the mistake is reverberating through trader circles not because of the stablecoin involved, but because the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/17 14:48