Bitcoin has surged to $94,000, marking a significant milestone as Bitwise CEO publicly acknowledges that the cryptocurrency has successfully navigated through a six-month bear market period. This price level represents renewed investor confidence and signals a potential shift in market sentiment as digital assets continue their volatile journey through 2025.Bitcoin has surged to $94,000, marking a significant milestone as Bitwise CEO publicly acknowledges that the cryptocurrency has successfully navigated through a six-month bear market period. This price level represents renewed investor confidence and signals a potential shift in market sentiment as digital assets continue their volatile journey through 2025.

Bitcoin Hits $94,000 as Bitwise CEO Declares End of Six-Month Bear Market

2025/11/16 15:18

Bitcoin has surged to $94,000, marking a significant milestone as Bitwise CEO publicly acknowledges that the cryptocurrency has successfully navigated through a six-month bear market period. This price level represents renewed investor confidence and signals a potential shift in market sentiment as digital assets continue their volatile journey through 2025.

Bitcoin's Price Recovery and Market Context

The rise to $94,000 represents a substantial recovery for Bitcoin, which has experienced considerable volatility throughout the past year. This price point demonstrates the cryptocurrency's resilience and ability to rebound from extended periods of downward pressure that characterize bear markets.

Bear markets in cryptocurrency typically involve prolonged price declines, reduced trading volumes, and diminished investor sentiment. A six-month bear market, as identified by Bitwise's CEO, would have tested the resolve of both institutional and retail investors. The fact that Bitcoin has emerged from this period at $94,000 suggests strong underlying demand and renewed market conviction.

The current price level also provides important context for Bitcoin's overall trajectory. While $94,000 falls short of Bitcoin's all-time highs, which exceeded $100,000 in previous cycles, it represents a significant recovery point that could serve as a foundation for further gains. Market participants often view such recoveries as inflection points where sentiment shifts from fear and capitulation to optimism and accumulation.

Trading volumes accompanying this price movement will be crucial for understanding the sustainability of this rally. High volumes would indicate broad participation across different investor categories, while low volumes might suggest the move is driven by a smaller group of buyers, potentially making it more fragile.

The six-month timeframe mentioned by Bitwise's CEO aligns with historical patterns in cryptocurrency markets, where bear markets can range from several months to over a year. This duration suggests the market underwent a meaningful correction and consolidation period, allowing excess speculation to be wrung out and creating a healthier foundation for subsequent growth.

Bitwise CEO's Market Assessment

The public statement from Bitwise's CEO carries significant weight given the company's prominent position in the cryptocurrency asset management industry. Bitwise operates several cryptocurrency investment products and maintains deep market expertise, making their market assessments particularly relevant for institutional investors.

By declaring that Bitcoin has experienced a six-month bear market, the CEO provides a framework for understanding recent price action. This characterization helps investors contextualize volatility and price movements within broader market cycles. Recognizing and naming market phases can influence investor behavior and market dynamics.

The timing of this statement, coinciding with Bitcoin's rise to $94,000, suggests confidence that the bear market has concluded and a new phase has begun. Such public declarations from prominent industry figures can influence market sentiment, potentially attracting investors who had remained on the sidelines during the downturn.

Bitwise's perspective likely incorporates multiple factors beyond simple price movements. Asset managers typically consider on-chain metrics, institutional adoption trends, regulatory developments, macroeconomic conditions, and technical analysis when assessing market phases. The CEO's characterization of the recent period as a bear market implies these various indicators pointed toward a sustained period of weakness.

The statement also provides validation for investors who accumulated Bitcoin during the downturn. Those who recognized the bear market as a buying opportunity and maintained conviction during difficult market conditions now see their positions validated by both price recovery and institutional confirmation of the market phase transition.

For institutional investors, such clear market phase identification from respected industry leaders can influence allocation decisions. Asset managers operating under specific mandates may adjust positions based on whether markets are characterized as bullish or bearish, making these assessments practically important beyond their analytical value.

Factors Driving Bitcoin's Recovery

Multiple factors likely contributed to Bitcoin's recovery to $94,000 following the six-month bear market. Understanding these drivers provides insight into the sustainability of current price levels and potential future trajectories.

Institutional adoption continues to play a crucial role in Bitcoin's price dynamics. Major financial institutions have increasingly incorporated Bitcoin into their service offerings, providing clients with exposure through various investment vehicles. This institutional participation brings larger capital flows and greater market stability compared to purely retail-driven markets.

Regulatory clarity in major jurisdictions has improved significantly, reducing uncertainty that previously weighed on cryptocurrency markets. Clearer regulatory frameworks allow institutional investors to participate more confidently, knowing the rules governing their investments. This regulatory evolution represents a long-term positive factor supporting Bitcoin adoption.

Macroeconomic conditions influence Bitcoin's performance as investors evaluate the cryptocurrency's role as a store of value and inflation hedge. Concerns about currency debasement, inflation, and monetary policy continue to drive interest in Bitcoin as an alternative asset. Economic uncertainty often benefits Bitcoin as investors seek assets outside traditional financial systems.

Technical factors also contribute to price movements. Bitcoin's mining difficulty, hash rate, and network security metrics have remained robust throughout the bear market, demonstrating the blockchain's fundamental strength regardless of short-term price volatility. Strong network fundamentals provide confidence for long-term investors.

Supply dynamics continue to favor Bitcoin's price appreciation. The cryptocurrency's fixed supply schedule, with halving events reducing new supply issuance, creates scarcity that supports value over time. As more Bitcoin is held in long-term storage by convinced holders, available supply for trading decreases, potentially amplifying price movements.

Market sentiment shifts can create self-reinforcing cycles. As prices recover and bear market narratives fade, previously cautious investors may re-enter the market, creating buying pressure that drives further gains. This psychological aspect of markets contributes to the momentum often seen in cryptocurrency recoveries.

Implications for Cryptocurrency Markets

Bitcoin's rise to $94,000 and the declared end of the bear market carry broader implications for cryptocurrency markets beyond Bitcoin itself. As the largest and most established cryptocurrency, Bitcoin's performance influences the entire digital asset ecosystem.

Altcoins typically follow Bitcoin's lead with amplified volatility in both directions. Bitcoin's recovery likely signals improving conditions for alternative cryptocurrencies, many of which suffered more severe declines during the bear market. Investors who maintained positions in quality altcoin projects may see substantial recoveries as market sentiment improves.

The end of a bear market often catalyzes renewed innovation and development in the cryptocurrency space. During downturns, serious builders continue developing technology and infrastructure while speculation subsides. As markets recover, these developments become more visible and attract investment, potentially driving the next wave of cryptocurrency adoption.

Institutional product development accelerates during market recoveries. Financial institutions are more likely to launch new cryptocurrency investment products when market sentiment is positive and client interest is high. This product expansion creates additional pathways for capital to enter cryptocurrency markets.

Regulatory attention intensifies during bull markets as policymakers respond to increased activity and public interest. While this attention can create short-term uncertainty, it ultimately contributes to the long-term legitimization of cryptocurrency markets through clearer rules and standards.

Market infrastructure continues to mature regardless of price cycles, but recoveries often highlight infrastructure improvements made during bear markets. Enhanced custody solutions, improved trading platforms, better analytics tools, and more sophisticated derivatives markets all support healthier price discovery and market efficiency.

Investor Strategies and Considerations

The current market environment, characterized by Bitcoin's recovery to $94,000 following a declared bear market, presents both opportunities and risks that investors must carefully evaluate.

Long-term investors who maintained positions through the bear market face decisions about whether to take profits, continue holding, or even add to positions. The recovery validates their patience but also raises questions about optimal exit strategies or rebalancing approaches.

New investors entering at current levels should recognize they are buying at significantly higher prices than were available during the bear market. While the recovery trajectory appears positive, late entrants to rallies face greater risk of short-term corrections. Dollar-cost averaging strategies may help mitigate timing risk for those building positions.

Risk management becomes crucial as markets transition from bear to potentially bull phases. The volatility that characterizes cryptocurrency markets persists regardless of overall trend direction. Investors should maintain appropriate position sizing, avoid excessive leverage, and have clear plans for various market scenarios.

Diversification across different cryptocurrencies and traditional assets remains important. While Bitcoin's recovery is encouraging, concentration in a single asset, even the leading cryptocurrency, exposes investors to significant risk. Balanced portfolios that include various asset classes provide more stable overall returns.

Monitoring key metrics helps investors make informed decisions. On-chain data, institutional flows, regulatory developments, and macroeconomic trends all influence cryptocurrency prices. Staying informed about these factors enables better timing and positioning decisions.

The psychological challenge of investing during market transitions cannot be understated. Fear of missing out can drive poor decisions during recoveries, just as panic can trigger selling at market bottoms. Maintaining discipline and following predetermined strategies helps investors avoid emotional mistakes.

Technical Analysis and Price Projections

From a technical perspective, Bitcoin's move to $94,000 presents interesting chart patterns and potential price targets that traders and analysts monitor.

The breach of key resistance levels during the recovery provides bullish signals. Each sustained move above previous resistance often turns those levels into support, creating a foundation for further gains. Technical analysts watch these levels closely for signs of trend continuation or reversal.

Moving averages offer insight into trend strength and sustainability. When short-term moving averages cross above long-term averages, it generates bullish signals that attract momentum-based traders. The relationship between Bitcoin's price and various moving averages influences technical trading strategies.

Volume analysis complements price analysis by revealing the strength behind price movements. High volume rallies suggest broad participation and conviction, while low volume moves may lack sustainability. Current volume patterns will help determine whether the rally to $94,000 has strong foundations.

Fibonacci retracement levels, derived from previous price swings, provide potential targets and support levels. Traders often watch these mathematically derived levels for potential reversal points or continuation signals. Bitcoin's current position relative to key Fibonacci levels influences short-term trading strategies.

While technical analysis provides useful frameworks for understanding price action, cryptocurrency markets also respond to fundamental factors that can override technical signals. News events, regulatory announcements, and macroeconomic developments can trigger price movements that ignore technical levels.

Price projections for Bitcoin vary widely among analysts, reflecting the market's inherent uncertainty. Some analysts see $94,000 as a stepping stone toward new all-time highs, while others caution that significant resistance may emerge at higher levels. These varied perspectives underscore the importance of individual research and risk assessment.

Regulatory and Institutional Developments

The cryptocurrency regulatory landscape continues evolving, with significant implications for Bitcoin's price trajectory and market development.

Major jurisdictions have made progress toward comprehensive cryptocurrency regulations. The United States, European Union, and Asian financial centers are developing frameworks that provide clarity while addressing concerns about consumer protection, financial stability, and illicit activity. This regulatory maturation supports institutional participation.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States represent a major development for institutional access. These products allow traditional investors to gain Bitcoin exposure through familiar investment vehicles, potentially channeling significant capital into the cryptocurrency. ETF performance and flows provide important indicators of institutional sentiment.

Central bank digital currencies development proceeds globally, with implications for cryptocurrency markets. While CBDCs differ fundamentally from decentralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, their development reflects growing acceptance of digital money and may ultimately benefit cryptocurrency adoption by familiarizing populations with digital assets.

Banking sector engagement with cryptocurrency has increased substantially. Major banks now offer cryptocurrency custody, trading, and advisory services to clients. This integration into traditional financial services legitimizes cryptocurrency while providing infrastructure for broader adoption.

Regulatory enforcement actions continue targeting fraud and market manipulation, which, while creating short-term uncertainty, ultimately contribute to market health by removing bad actors. A cleaner, more regulated market attracts institutional capital that might otherwise avoid cryptocurrency.

International coordination on cryptocurrency regulation progresses through organizations like the Financial Action Task Force and various international standard-setting bodies. Harmonized global standards would reduce regulatory arbitrage opportunities while creating clearer operating environments for legitimate cryptocurrency businesses.

Macroeconomic Context and Bitcoin's Role

Bitcoin's performance cannot be separated from broader macroeconomic conditions that influence all asset markets.

Inflation concerns persist globally, supporting Bitcoin's narrative as a store of value and inflation hedge. While short-term correlations between Bitcoin and inflation metrics can be noisy, long-term investors often view Bitcoin's fixed supply as protection against currency debasement.

Interest rate policies from central banks significantly impact cryptocurrency markets. Higher interest rates increase the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like Bitcoin, while lower rates make such assets relatively more attractive. Current monetary policy stances across major economies influence Bitcoin's investment appeal.

Global economic uncertainty drives interest in alternative assets outside traditional financial systems. Geopolitical tensions, debt concerns, and banking system stability questions contribute to Bitcoin's appeal as a non-sovereign asset that exists outside traditional financial infrastructure.

Dollar strength affects Bitcoin prices, as the cryptocurrency is primarily priced in dollars. A stronger dollar can create headwinds for Bitcoin and other commodities, while dollar weakness often correlates with Bitcoin strength. Currency markets therefore provide important context for Bitcoin price movements.

Institutional portfolio allocation trends show increasing acceptance of cryptocurrency as an asset class. Major endowments, pension funds, and family offices have begun including cryptocurrency allocations in portfolios, representing a secular shift that supports long-term demand regardless of short-term price volatility.

Risks and Challenges Ahead

Despite the positive momentum reflected in Bitcoin's rise to $94,000, significant risks and challenges remain that could impact future performance.

Regulatory risk persists as governments continue developing cryptocurrency policies. Adverse regulatory developments in major markets could trigger sell-offs and constrain growth. Investors must monitor regulatory evolution across multiple jurisdictions.

Market manipulation concerns remain despite improved market infrastructure and surveillance. Large holders can still influence prices, particularly during lower liquidity periods. Regulatory oversight and market maturation should gradually reduce these risks.

Technology risks include potential security vulnerabilities, scaling challenges, and competition from alternative blockchain platforms. While Bitcoin's network has proven remarkably secure and resilient, technology evolves rapidly, and Bitcoin must continue adapting to maintain its leading position.

Macroeconomic shocks could trigger broad risk-off sentiment that impacts all asset classes, including Bitcoin. Severe economic downturns, financial crises, or geopolitical conflicts could drive investors toward safety and liquidity, potentially pressuring Bitcoin prices.

Environmental concerns about Bitcoin mining's energy consumption continue attracting criticism and regulatory attention. While the mining industry increasingly utilizes renewable energy, these concerns could influence regulatory approaches and institutional adoption decisions.

Competition from other cryptocurrencies and blockchain platforms continues intensifying. While Bitcoin maintains dominance in market capitalization and recognition, technological innovations in competing platforms could gradually erode its market position if Bitcoin cannot effectively adapt.

Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You May Also Like

Ethereum holders transfer or sell their coins more frequently than BTC holders – Glassnode

Ethereum holders transfer or sell their coins more frequently than BTC holders – Glassnode

The post Ethereum holders transfer or sell their coins more frequently than BTC holders – Glassnode appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Blockchain data analysis company Glassnode found that Bitcoin users continue to hold their coins tightly, whereas Ethereum holders are far more active in moving or cashing out their coins. In its report, the firm noted that BTC was starting to resemble a “digital savings asset,” seeing how it’s transferred far less often than Ethereum. In contrast, it compared ETH to digital oil, a token that’s both stored and constantly spent to power the network and back collateral. It wrote, “Bitcoin behaves like the digital savings asset it was designed to be, in that coins are largely hoarded, turnover is low, and recent behavior shows that more supply is migrating into long-term hold wrappers rather than sitting on exchanges.” Glassnode noted that Ethereum’s old tokens circulate much faster than Bitcoin’s Glassnode noted, however, that Ethereum’s activity mirrors what you’d expect from a high-throughput smart-contract network, especially since it’s supported by a large staking base and, more recently, boosted by ETF-driven investor demand. According to the report, the token’s long-term holders are circulating old coins three times faster than those of BTC, which suggests a utility-driven culture among holders. In practice, ETH fuels countless crypto operations; users need it to send digital dollars, make token trades on decentralized exchanges, or pay gas fees. The divergence in holder behavior between Bitcoin and Ethereum has become ‘more relevant than ever due to institutional engagement,’ say market analysts. Long-term trends in holding are often a testament to investors’ faith in the asset’s monetary properties. At the same time, a high velocity of a token generally reflects that the network demand has been strong. As crypto assets are increasingly scrutinized by institutions for their utility versus store-of-value factors, the behavior split between BTC and ETH is expected to impact portfolio allocation strategies as 2025 comes to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/16 14:01
A review of major stablecoin de-pegging events over the past five years: a triple test of mechanism, trust, and regulation.

A review of major stablecoin de-pegging events over the past five years: a triple test of mechanism, trust, and regulation.

Author: Viee, a core contributor to Biteye *The full text is approximately 5000 words, and the estimated reading time is 13 minutes. Over the past five years, we have witnessed stablecoins de-pegging in multiple scenarios. From algorithms and high-leverage designs to the chain reaction of real-world bank failures, stablecoins are undergoing one trust rebuild after another. In this article, we attempt to connect several landmark stablecoin de-pegging events in the crypto industry between 2021 and 2025, analyze the underlying causes and impacts, and explore the lessons learned from these crises. The First Avalanche: The Collapse of Algorithmic Stablecoins If there was one crash that first shook the narrative of "algorithmic stablecoins," it was IRON Finance in the summer of 2021. At that time, the IRON/TITAN model on Polygon became a viral sensation. IRON is a partially collateralized stablecoin: partly backed by USDC and partly backed by the value of the governance coin TITAN through an algorithmic dependency. As a result, when large TITAN sell orders made the price unstable, large holders began to sell, triggering a chain reaction of bank runs: IRON redemptions → minting and selling more TITAN → TITAN collapse → IRON stablecoin further lost its anchoring ability. This is a classic "death spiral": Once the price of the internal assets that are being supported and anchored plummets, the mechanism will have little room for repair and will eventually decouple and return to zero. On the day TITAN collapsed, even prominent American investor Mark Cuban was not spared. More importantly, it made the market realize for the first time that algorithmic stablecoins are highly dependent on market confidence and internal mechanisms, and once confidence collapses, it is difficult to prevent a "death spiral." Collective disillusionment: LUNA returns to zero In May 2022, the cryptocurrency world witnessed the largest stablecoin crash in history, with Terra's algorithmic stablecoin UST and its sister coin LUNA both collapsing. UST, then the third-largest stablecoin with a market capitalization of $18 billion, was once considered a successful example of algorithmic stablecoins. However, in early May, UST experienced a massive sell-off on Curve/Anchor, gradually falling below $1 and triggering a sustained run on the exchange. UST quickly lost its 1:1 peg to the US dollar, and its price plummeted from nearly $1 to less than $0.3 within days. To maintain the peg, the protocol issued a large amount of LUNA to redeem UST, resulting in a subsequent collapse in the price of LUNA. In just a few days, LUNA plummeted from $119 to near zero, wiping out nearly $40 billion in market value. UST dropped to a few cents, and the entire Terra ecosystem vanished within a week. It can be said that LUNA's demise made the entire industry truly realize for the first time: Algorithms themselves cannot create value; they can only allocate risk. The mechanism is highly susceptible to entering an irreversible spiral structure under extreme market conditions; Investor confidence is the only trump card, and it's the easiest to fail. This time, global regulators have for the first time included "stablecoin risks" in their compliance considerations. The United States, South Korea, the European Union, and other countries have successively imposed strict restrictions on algorithmic stablecoins. It's not just the algorithm that's unstable: the ripple effects of USDC on traditional finance. With numerous problems in the algorithm model, are centralized, 100% reserve stablecoins truly risk-free? In 2023, the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) scandal erupted when Circle admitted to holding $3.3 billion in USDC reserves with SVB. Amid market panic, the USDC briefly de-pegged to $0.87. This incident was a classic example of "price de-pegging": short-term payment capability was questioned, triggering a market sell-off. Fortunately, this de-pegging was only a brief panic, and the company quickly issued a transparent announcement, promising to cover any potential shortfall with its own funds. Ultimately, the USDC was able to re-peg after the Federal Reserve announced its decision to protect deposits. It is clear that the "anchor" of stablecoins is not only reserves, but also confidence in the liquidity of reserves. This turmoil also reminds us that even the most traditional stablecoins cannot be completely isolated from traditional financial risks. Once the pegged assets rely on the real-world banking system, their vulnerability is unavoidable. A false alarm of "de-anchoring": The USDE revolving loan crisis Recently, the cryptocurrency market experienced an unprecedented 10/11 crash panic, and the stablecoin USDe was caught in the eye of the storm. Fortunately, the eventual de-pegging was only a temporary price deviation and did not indicate a problem with its internal mechanism. USDe, issued by Ethena Labs, once ranked among the top three in global market capitalization. Unlike USDT and USDC, which have equivalent reserves, USDe uses an on-chain Delta-neutral strategy to maintain its peg. Theoretically, this "long spot + short perpetual" structure can withstand volatility. In practice, this design has proven stable in calm markets and allows users to earn a basic annualized return of 12%. On top of the already well-functioning mechanism, some users have spontaneously developed a "revolving loan" strategy: pledging USDe to borrow other stablecoins, then exchanging them back for more USDe to continue pledging, layering leverage, and using lending protocol incentives to increase annualized returns. Until October 11th, a sudden negative macroeconomic event occurred in the US: Trump announced high tariffs on China, triggering panic selling in the market. During this process, the USDe's stable peg itself did not suffer systemic damage, but due to a combination of factors, a temporary price deviation occurred: On the one hand, some users used USDe as margin for derivatives, and due to extreme market conditions triggering contract liquidation, a large amount of selling pressure appeared in the market. At the same time, the "revolving loan" structure with leverage on some lending platforms also faced liquidation one after another, further exacerbating the selling pressure on stablecoins. On the other hand, due to on-chain gas issues during the withdrawal process of exchanges, the arbitrage channel was not smooth, and the price deviation after the stablecoins were de-pegged could not be corrected in time. Ultimately, multiple mechanisms collapsed simultaneously, causing a brief market panic. USDe briefly fell from $1 to around $0.6 before recovering. Unlike some "asset failure" type de-anchoring incidents, the assets in this event did not disappear; the temporary imbalance in the anchoring was caused by factors such as macroeconomic headwinds, liquidity constraints, and liquidation paths. Following the incident, the Ethena team issued a statement clarifying that the system was functioning normally and that collateral was sufficient. Subsequently, the team announced it would strengthen monitoring and increase the collateral ratio to enhance the liquidity pool's capacity. Aftershocks continue: a chain reaction of sell-offs in xUSD, deUSD, and USDX. The aftershocks of the USDe incident had not yet subsided when another crisis erupted in November. USDX is a compliant stablecoin launched by Stable Labs, which complies with EU MiCA regulatory requirements and is pegged 1:1 to the US dollar. However, around November 6th, the price of USDX quickly fell below $1 on-chain, plummeting to as low as about $0.3, instantly losing nearly 70% of its value. The trigger was the depegging of xUSD, a yield-generating stablecoin issued by Stream, due to its external fund manager reporting approximately $93 million in asset losses. Stream immediately suspended deposits and withdrawals on its platform, and xUSD quickly fell below its peg during the panic sell-off, dropping from $1 to $0.23. Following the collapse of xUSD, the chain reaction quickly spread to Elixir and its stablecoin deUSD. Elixir had previously lent 68 million USDC to Stream, representing 65% of its total deUSD reserves, with Stream using xUSD as collateral. When xUSD fell by more than 65%, the asset backing of deUSD collapsed instantly, triggering a massive run on the cryptocurrency and causing its price to plummet. The run on the banks didn't stop there. The panic selling then spread to other similar yield-generating stablecoins, such as USDX. In just a few days, the overall market capitalization of stablecoins evaporated by over $2 billion. A protocol crisis ultimately escalated into a liquidation of the entire sector, revealing not only problems with the mechanism design but also demonstrating that the high-frequency coupling between the internal structures of DeFi means that risks are never isolated. The Triple Test of Mechanism, Trust, and Regulation When we look back at the cases of de-anchoring over the past five years, we find a glaring fact: the biggest risk of stablecoins is that everyone assumes they are "stable". From algorithmic models to centralized custody, from yield-generating innovations to composite cross-chain stablecoins, these pegging mechanisms can experience collapses or overnight losses, often due to either design flaws or a breakdown in trust. We must acknowledge that stablecoins are not merely products, but rather a mechanism-based credit structure built upon a series of assumptions that "will not be broken." 1. Not all anchors are reliable. Algorithmic stablecoins often rely on governance token buybacks and minting mechanisms. Once liquidity is insufficient, expectations collapse, and the governance token plummets, the price can fall like dominoes. Fiat reserve stablecoins (centralized): These emphasize "dollar reserves," but their stability is not entirely detached from the traditional financial system. Bank risk, custodian risk, liquidity freezes, and policy fluctuations can all erode the "promise" behind them. Even when reserves are ample but redemption capacity is limited, the risk of de-pegging remains. Yield-based stablecoins: These products integrate yield mechanisms, leverage strategies, or multiple asset portfolios into the stablecoin structure, bringing higher returns but also hidden risks. Their operation relies not only on arbitrage opportunities but also on external custody, investment returns, and strategy execution. 2. The risk transmission of stablecoins is much faster than we imagined. The collapse of xUSD is a classic example of the "contagion effect": when one protocol has a problem, another uses its stablecoin as collateral, and a third designs a stablecoin with a similar mechanism, and all of them are dragged down. Especially in the DeFi ecosystem, stablecoins are collateral assets, counterparties, and liquidation tools. Once the "anchor" is loosened, the entire chain, the entire DEX system, and even the entire strategy ecosystem will be affected and react. 3. Weak supervision: the process of filling the regulatory gaps is still ongoing. Currently, Europe and the United States have successively introduced various draft regulations categorized by type: MiCA explicitly denies the legal status of algorithmic stablecoins, and the US GENIUS Act attempts to regulate reserve mechanisms and redemption requirements. This is a positive trend; however, regulation still faces the following challenges: The cross-border nature of stablecoins makes them difficult for any single country to fully regulate. The model is complex, and there is a high degree of interconnection between on-chain and real-world assets. Regulatory agencies have not yet reached a consensus on its financial and liquidation attributes. Information disclosure is not yet fully standardized. Although on-chain transparency is high, the responsibilities of issuers, custodians, etc. remain relatively vague. Conclusion: Crisis brings opportunities for industry restructuring The crisis of stablecoins de-anchoring not only reminds us of the risks of the mechanism, but also forces the entire industry to move towards a healthier evolutionary path. On the one hand, technology is proactively addressing past vulnerabilities. For example, Ethena is adjusting its collateral ratio and strengthening monitoring in an attempt to hedge against volatility risk through proactive management. On the other hand, industry transparency is also continuously improving. On-chain audits and regulatory requirements are gradually becoming the foundation of the next generation of stablecoins, which helps to enhance trust. More importantly, users' understanding is also evolving. More and more users are beginning to pay attention to the underlying details of stablecoins, such as their mechanisms, collateral structures, and risk exposures. The focus of the stablecoin industry is shifting from "how to grow quickly" to "how to operate stably". After all, only by truly improving risk resistance can we create financial instruments that can truly support the next cycle.
Share
PANews2025/11/16 14:12
Ondo Finance Launches USDY Yieldcoin on Stellar, Bringing Tokenized U.S. Treasuries to Users

Ondo Finance Launches USDY Yieldcoin on Stellar, Bringing Tokenized U.S. Treasuries to Users

Ondo Finance, a U.S.-based digital asset firm specializing in bringing traditional financial products on-chain through tokenization, is expanding its yieldcoin USDY to the Stellar network. This lates update marks a step forward in merging tokenized real-world assets with a global payments infrastructure, unlocking new opportunities for users worldwide. The announcement was made at the Stellar Meridian event in Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro, on September 17. USDY Joins the Stellar Ecosystem Ondo Finance, a recognized leader in tokenized real-world assets, announced the deployment of United States Dollar Yield (USDY) on Stellar, the payments-focused blockchain known for speed and low transaction costs. USDY is the most widely available “yieldcoin,” offering investors access to onchain assets backed by U.S. Treasuries. This launch allows Stellar’s global user base to tap into permissionless, yield-bearing assets tied to one of the safest financial instruments in the world. It also aligns with Stellar’s mission of driving fast, affordable cross-border payments. Combining Yield with Payments Infrastructure “Stablecoins unlocked global access to the U.S. dollar. With USDY, we’re taking the next step by bringing U.S. Treasuries onchain in a form that combines stability, liquidity, and yield,” said Ian De Bode, Chief Strategy Officer at Ondo Finance. “Fast, affordable cross-border payments are at the center of what Stellar was designed to do. The global reach of the Stellar ecosystem combined with a yield-bearing asset like USDY levels up what is possible onchain, allowing wallets and businesses to offer yield opportunities to their users,” said Denelle Dixon, CEO of the Stellar Development Foundation. Ondo claims by pairing USDY with Stellar’s infrastructure, new possibilities open up in treasury management, collateralization, and everyday financial applications. Unlocking Institutional and Retail Use Cases USDY currently manages over $650 million in total value locked (TVL) across nine blockchains and offers a 5.3% APY. By launching on Stellar, Ondo Finance extends these benefits to global retail and institutional users. The firm explains balances on Stellar can now become productive, supporting use cases such as onchain savings, institutional treasury strategies, cost-efficient collateral for DeFi protocols, and remittance flows that carry yield rather than remaining static. A Milestone for Tokenized Treasuries With the integration of USDY, Stellar users gain more than just access to stable-value assets—they gain access to institutional-grade yield. For investors outside the U.S., the launch represents a new way to combine the safety of Treasuries with the accessibility of blockchain technology. As tokenization accelerates globally, Ondo Finance’s decision to deploy USDY on Stellar reinforces the narrative that blockchain is not just about speculation, but about reimagining the global financial system through secure, yield-bearing digital assets
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:46