'We intend to avail of all appropriate remedies under the law to seek its reversal,' says Julianna Agpalo, Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil's legal counsel'We intend to avail of all appropriate remedies under the law to seek its reversal,' says Julianna Agpalo, Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil's legal counsel

Groups decry court order affirming Cumpio, Domequil’s terror conviction

2026/03/28 15:54
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

CEBU, Philippines – Groups condemned the Tacloban City Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 45’s denial of activists Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil’s appeals on their terror financing conviction and bail plea.

Julianna Agpalo, Cumpio and Domequil’s legal counsel, told Rappler on Friday evening, March 27, that they disagreed with the ruling and found it to be unjust.

“We likewise express our grave concern over the continued prosecution of cases founded on provisions that are patently unconstitutional, thereby rendering any continued detention unjust and inequitable,” she said.

The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) said in a statement on Friday that they were “extremely disappointed” with the court’s decision.

According to the NUJP, the judge’s “blind faith” in the testimonies of self-declared rebel surrenderers sets a dangerous precedent for journalists, humanitarian workers, and activists in the country.

“Even without documentary evidence, the court can punish those wrongfully accused by individuals acting in cahoots with state security forces,” the NUJP stressed.

The Altermidya Network condemned the ruling, calling out the court’s verdict for “resting heavily on incredible and preposterous testimonies of dubious witnesses.”

On Saturday, March 28, KAPATID, a support group for friends and family members of political prisoners, also condemned the court’s ruling.

Hindi sila terorista. Sila ay kabataang tagapaglingkod at mamamahayag na pinarusahan sa gawa-gawang kaso (They are not terrorists. They are young people who serve and journalists who were penalized with trumped-up charges),” KAPATID’s statement read.

On January 22, Cumpio and Domequil were convicted of terrorism financing based on the testimonies of alleged rebel returnees, effectively penalizing them with 12 to 18 years imprisonment.

Five days later, the two activists, through their counsel, filed a joint motion to be allowed post-conviction bail. This was denied by the court on February 13. 

The accused had filed a motion for reconsideration on February 6 to appeal the conviction. They also filed a joint motion for reconsideration to appeal the denial of their bail plea later that month, on February 23.

“The arguments raised by the movants-accused merely reiterated some matters that were previously considered and resolved,” Judge Georgina Uy Perez of the Tacloban City RTC Branch 45 said in an omnibus order on Wednesday, March 25.

What were the appeals?

In their appeal of the terror conviction, the accused argued that the judgment was “tainted by reversible errors of law and serious misappreciation of facts.”

They provided four reasons why this was the case:

  • the absence, at the time material to the case, of a valid, operative, and constitutionally sound designation of the Communist Party of the Philippines-New People’s Army (CPP-NPA) within the Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act of 2012
  • the prosecution’s failure to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the accused knowingly, willfully, and lawfully made funds or property available to a designated person or organization
  • a misappreciation of evidence in the form of undue and uncritical reliance on the testimonies of cooperating former rebels without independent corroboration required by law
  • the discounting of the defense’s evidence through an application of an incorrect and asymmetrical standard of proof.

In a Facebook post on Friday, Ephraim Cortez, president of the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers, explained that the alleged act of terrorism financing was committed before the CPP-NPA was designated a terrorist organization by a foreign jurisdiction.

“Moreover, the Supreme Court declared designation by a foreign jurisdiction unconstitutional in Calleja vs. Executive Secretary. While the acts attributed to Frenchie and Marielle were allegedly committed before the promulgation of Calleja vs. Executive Secretary, the complaint against them was filed after the Supreme Court rendered its aforecited decision,” Cortez added.

In the joint appeal for the bail plea, the accused stated that bail should not be denied solely based on the nature or the gravity of the offense, or on speculative considerations.

“The prosecution merely invoked national security, symbolism, and third-party conduct, while the accused-movants presented documentary evidence showing the nonexistence of the bail-negating circumstances,” the omnibus order said, citing the joint motion.

The accused argued that they fully cooperated with the proceedings and did not evade the court’s jurisdiction, making them unlikely to abscond if granted bail.

What did the court say?

The judge clarified that it did not rely only on the designations of the CPP-NPA from foreign jurisdictions. Uy referred to Proclamation No. 374, issued on December 5, 2017, that declared the CPP-NPA as a designated organization.

“The movants’ insistence that no valid designation existed at the time of the commission of the offense is therefore contradicted by statute and the undisputed factual record,” Uy said in the order.

The court also maintained that the prosecution’s witnesses, the former rebels, were able to establish the voluntary nature of the accused’s act in financing terrorism, and that the witness testimonies were credible and corroborated one another.

The judge also reiterated her previous take on the discounting of the defense’s evidence, stating that mere presentation of documentary or digital evidence would not automatically overcome positive identification.

“The court reiterates that proof beyond reasonable doubt does not require absolute certainty, only moral certainty — that degree of proof which produces conviction in an unprejudiced mind,” Uy ruled. 

As of this writing, the court stated that the transfer order for Cumpio and Domequil from the Tacloban City Jail to the Correctional Institution for Women in Mandaluyong City will remain in effect. 

“We intend to avail of all appropriate remedies under the law to seek its reversal,” Agpalo said. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Orderly Network Logo
Orderly Network Price(ORDER)
$0.05
$0.05$0.05
+0.60%
USD
Orderly Network (ORDER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SBI VC Trade Launches Ripple’s RLUSD in Japan

SBI VC Trade Launches Ripple’s RLUSD in Japan

The post SBI VC Trade Launches Ripple’s RLUSD in Japan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Japan Unleashes RLUSD: SBI VC Trade Flips the Switch on Ripple’s Stablecoin
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/04/01 01:29
One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

The post One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew returns to the Jazz Albums and Traditional Jazz Albums charts, showing continued demand for his timeless music. Frank Sinatra performs on his TV special Frank Sinatra: A Man and his Music Bettmann Archive These days on the Billboard charts, Frank Sinatra’s music can always be found on the jazz-specific rankings. While the art he created when he was still working was pop at the time, and later classified as traditional pop, there is no such list for the latter format in America, and so his throwback projects and cuts appear on jazz lists instead. It’s on those charts where Sinatra rebounds this week, and one of his popular projects returns not to one, but two tallies at the same time, helping him increase the total amount of real estate he owns at the moment. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew Returns Sinatra’s The World We Knew is a top performer again, if only on the jazz lists. That set rebounds to No. 15 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart and comes in at No. 20 on the all-encompassing Jazz Albums ranking after not appearing on either roster just last frame. The World We Knew’s All-Time Highs The World We Knew returns close to its all-time peak on both of those rosters. Sinatra’s classic has peaked at No. 11 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart, just missing out on becoming another top 10 for the crooner. The set climbed all the way to No. 15 on the Jazz Albums tally and has now spent just under two months on the rosters. Frank Sinatra’s Album With Classic Hits Sinatra released The World We Knew in the summer of 1967. The title track, which on the album is actually known as “The World We Knew (Over and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:02
Dogecoin Price Prediction For 2025, As Analysts Call Pepeto The Next 100x

Dogecoin Price Prediction For 2025, As Analysts Call Pepeto The Next 100x

Traders hunting the best crypto to buy now and the best crypto investment in 2025 keep watching doge, yet today’s […] The post Dogecoin Price Prediction For 2025, As Analysts Call Pepeto The Next 100x appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 00:39