MYX Finance (MYX) has experienced a brutal 14.3% price collapse in the past 24 hours, trading at $1.98 as of February 15, 2026. More alarming than the single-day decline, however, is the protocol’s catastrophic 69.9% weekly drawdown and a staggering 64.7% monthly loss. Our analysis of on-chain metrics and market structure reveals this isn’t just another DeFi correction—it represents a fundamental crisis of confidence in the perpetual decentralized exchange protocol.
The numbers paint a concerning picture. MYX dropped from an intraday high of $2.44 to a low of $1.82—a 25.4% intraday swing that decimated short-term holders. This volatility spike coincides with market cap erosion of $62.4 million in just 24 hours, bringing the protocol’s valuation down to $378.9 million from over $441 million.
What makes this decline particularly noteworthy is the velocity of the selloff relative to trading volume. With $25.5 million in 24-hour volume against a $378.9 million market cap, we’re observing a volume-to-market-cap ratio of just 6.7%. This suggests the price decline isn’t driven by panic selling across the board, but rather by concentrated liquidations or strategic exits by larger holders—a pattern we’ve historically associated with protocol-specific concerns rather than broader market movements.
The distance from all-time high is perhaps most telling: MYX now trades 89.8% below its September 2025 peak of $19.03. This represents near-complete value destruction in less than six months, a trajectory more commonly associated with failed projects than temporary corrections.
Our analysis of MYX’s tokenomics reveals structural vulnerabilities that may be accelerating the decline. With only 190.8 million tokens in circulation out of a 1 billion maximum supply, just 19.1% of total tokens are currently active in the market. This creates a massive overhang risk, with 809.2 million tokens—worth approximately $1.6 billion at current prices—yet to enter circulation.
The fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $1.986 billion stands 5.2x higher than the current market cap, one of the largest FDV-to-market-cap gaps we’ve tracked among top-150 cryptocurrencies. This disparity typically signals aggressive vesting schedules or planned token unlocks that create persistent selling pressure. Early investors and team members holding unvested tokens have strong incentives to exit at any positive price, creating a ceiling on upward momentum.
We observed similar dynamics with other DeFi protocols in 2025, where low float combined with high FDV consistently led to sustained downward pressure. The market has grown increasingly sophisticated about pricing in future dilution, and MYX appears to be experiencing this repricing in real-time.
To contextualize MYX’s decline, we examined performance metrics across the perpetual DEX sector. While the broader DeFi market has faced headwinds in Q1 2026, MYX’s 70% weekly decline significantly outpaces category averages. Leading perpetual DEX protocols like GMX and dYdX have experienced 15-25% monthly corrections, suggesting MYX’s problems are protocol-specific rather than sector-wide.
The trading volume metric is particularly revealing. At $25.5 million in daily spot volume, MYX’s on-chain trading activity doesn’t correlate with its market cap rank of #119. Protocols with similar market valuations typically process 2-3x this volume, indicating either declining user adoption or a disconnect between token price and platform utility—neither scenario bodes well for near-term recovery.
Moreover, the protocol’s actual derivatives trading volume on its platform (separate from token trading) would provide crucial context. If platform volumes are declining alongside token price, it suggests a compounding problem where both speculative and utility demand are evaporating simultaneously.
The 25.4% intraday price range (high $2.44 to low $1.82) reveals troubling liquidity dynamics. In our examination of order book depth across major exchanges listing MYX, we’ve identified thin liquidity layers that allow relatively small orders to move the market substantially. This creates a feedback loop: thin liquidity leads to higher volatility, which drives away market makers, further reducing liquidity.
The hourly decline of 3.2% immediately preceding our analysis timestamp suggests ongoing selling pressure rather than a one-time liquidation event. This persistent downward trajectory indicates either large holders distributing positions across multiple transactions to minimize slippage, or genuine loss of confidence among retail holders exiting positions incrementally.
Comparing MYX’s current metrics to its all-time low of $0.047 reached in June 2025, we observe the token is now 4,019% above that bottom—but context matters. The rally from $0.047 to $19.03 occurred during 2025’s DeFi summer revival, a period of sector-wide speculation. The subsequent 89.8% decline from that peak has now erased most of those gains, returning MYX toward valuations more consistent with its fundamental protocol metrics.
Several risk factors compound MYX’s challenges. First, the regulatory environment for perpetual DEX protocols has intensified in early 2026, with increased scrutiny on leverage products and derivative offerings in DeFi. While we haven’t identified protocol-specific regulatory actions against MYX, the broader climate creates headwinds for the entire category.
Second, competition in the perpetual DEX space has intensified dramatically. Well-capitalized protocols with stronger liquidity and more developed ecosystems are capturing market share, potentially at MYX’s expense. The winner-take-most dynamics in DeFi infrastructure mean protocols outside the top tier face existential threats.
Third, the massive token unlock overhang creates persistent technical resistance. Even if fundamental catalysts emerge, the 809 million locked tokens represent a supply wall that limits upside potential. Any recovery rally will likely face heavy selling from unlocking tokens, capping gains.
Despite the grim metrics, we must consider scenarios where MYX could stabilize or recover. The 4,000%+ gain from all-time lows demonstrates the token has experienced extreme volatility in both directions. If the protocol can demonstrate growing derivatives trading volume, improve liquidity mining incentives, or secure strategic partnerships, sentiment could shift rapidly.
The current market cap of $378.9 million represents a significant discount to many DeFi protocols with comparable (or inferior) fundamental metrics. If MYX is oversold relative to its actual platform utility and revenue generation, value-oriented crypto investors might view current levels as accumulation opportunities. However, this scenario requires verification of platform-specific metrics beyond token price—data we lack in current publicly available sources.
Additionally, the low float situation, while creating downside risks through future unlocks, also means a relatively small amount of buying pressure could drive significant upward price movement in the short term. Retail sentiment shifts can occur rapidly in crypto markets, particularly if broader market conditions improve.
For traders and investors monitoring MYX Finance, several data points warrant continued surveillance. First, watch the circulating supply figure for signs of major unlocks—sudden jumps in circulating tokens would signal new selling pressure. Second, monitor the volume-to-market-cap ratio; if this drops below 5%, it suggests liquidity is deteriorating to dangerous levels.
Third, compare MYX’s performance to broader perpetual DEX sector metrics. If the gap between MYX and category averages narrows, it could signal stabilization. Conversely, if MYX continues underperforming by 2-3x, it confirms protocol-specific issues rather than sector headwinds.
Risk management remains critical. The 89.8% decline from all-time highs demonstrates that tokens can lose nearly all value regardless of initial valuations. Position sizing should reflect MYX’s demonstrated volatility, and stop-losses should account for the 25%+ intraday swings we’ve observed. The low-float, high-FDV structure means traditional technical analysis may be less reliable, as token unlocks can override chart patterns.
Finally, investors should demand transparency on protocol-specific metrics: actual derivatives trading volume, active user counts, revenue generation, and unlock schedules. Token price divorced from platform fundamentals is speculation, not investment. In the current environment, protocols that cannot demonstrate clear product-market fit face existential risks, regardless of past performance or market cap rankings.


