Recently released Epstein emails provide new context for blockchain developments leading up to the XRP lawsuit. Prominent crypto commentator Digital Asset InvestorRecently released Epstein emails provide new context for blockchain developments leading up to the XRP lawsuit. Prominent crypto commentator Digital Asset Investor

When Michael Casey Said “Game Over” After Coinbase Suspended XRP Trading

2026/02/14 17:02
3 min read

Recently released Epstein emails provide new context for blockchain developments leading up to the XRP lawsuit. Prominent crypto commentator Digital Asset Investor shared emails showing Austin Hill, a Canadian blockchain entrepreneur and Blockstream co-founder, communicating with Jeffrey Epstein and Michael J. Casey in November 2017.

The emails reveal Hill coordinating blockchain projects and strategy with Casey and Epstein. They suggest these figures were aware of developments that would later affect XRP and its regulatory environment.

Hill’s 2017 Communications

On November 28, 2017, Hill sent an email to Epstein discussing ongoing blockchain initiatives. He asked whether to continue the work with Casey on project planning and design or pause certain efforts.

He also noted having prepared research and briefing materials to share. Hill communicated with Epstein about scheduling and project timelines, indicating he was actively engaged in multiple blockchain projects at the time.

These exchanges show Hill coordinating information and strategy with both Epstein and Casey, suggesting potential roles in early blockchain networks.

Casey’s 2020 Reaction

On December 29, 2020, Casey tweeted, “Game over.” This tweet is notable because it was a response to Coinbase’s suspension of XRP trading following the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple.

The lawsuit focused on whether XRP was a security, creating significant market disruption. The timing of Hill’s emails and Casey’s later public response suggests these figures may have had early awareness of industry dynamics that influenced XRP’s positioning and the regulatory attention it received.

Some in the crypto community have speculated that former SEC Chair Gary Gensler was sent after XRP. They believe it’s targeted due to its growing prominence and potential challenge to traditional financial structures.

Hill’s coordination with Casey in 2017 may have given them insight into XRP’s strategic role in the market. Casey’s 2020 reaction aligns with the unfolding legal pressure against Ripple at the time, deepening this connection.

Hill’s Role and Influence

Hill is primarily known for co-founding Blockstream and guiding early blockchain investments and project strategy. The emails demonstrate his coordination with Epstein and Casey, focusing on project planning and information sharing.

Was XRP Targeted?

Former Ripple CTO David Schwartz recently suggested that these leaked emails might be the tip of a giant iceberg. Recent emails show that Hill called Ripple “bad for the ecosystem,” and this link suggests stronger coordination among all parties to suppress XRP.

These documents do not confirm any direct intervention, but hint at an unknown connection that may be revealed as more files are released.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.


Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and  Google News

The post When Michael Casey Said “Game Over” After Coinbase Suspended XRP Trading appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.4726
$1.4726$1.4726
+0.24%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X Üst Düzey Yetkilisi, Platformda Kripto Paralar İçin Müjdeyi Verdi! Ancak Bazı Altcoinler İçin Kötü Haber Olabilir

X Üst Düzey Yetkilisi, Platformda Kripto Paralar İçin Müjdeyi Verdi! Ancak Bazı Altcoinler İçin Kötü Haber Olabilir

X Ürün Lideri ve Solana ekosistem danışmanı Nikita Bier, sosyal medya platformu X’te kripto para kullanımının artmasını desteklediğini ancak spam ve tacizi teşvik
Share
Coinstats2026/02/14 23:11
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

Exploring how the costs of a pandemic can lead to a self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy, analyzing the resulting changes in network structure and the existence of stable equilibria.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:00