Policy Share Share this article Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail U.S.-based DeFi group urges UK FCA to anchor Policy Share Share this article Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail U.S.-based DeFi group urges UK FCA to anchor

U.S.-based DeFi group urges UK FCA to anchor crypto rules to 'unilateral control'

2026/02/13 23:19
4 min read
Share
Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail

U.S.-based DeFi group urges UK FCA to anchor crypto rules to 'unilateral control'

DeFi Education Fund says developers of non-custodial protocols should not be regulated as intermediaries under the U.K.’s proposed crypto regime.

By Jamie Crawley, AI Boost|Edited by Jesse Hamilton
Feb 13, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
Make us preferred on Google
UK FCA (FCA, modified by CoinDesk)

What to know:

  • The DeFi Education Fund tells FCA that regulatory obligations should apply only where there is “unilateral control” over user assets or transactions.
  • The U.S.-based group argues non-custodial DeFi developers should not be treated like centralized intermediaries.
  • DEF warns that applying trading platform and prudential requirements and full money-laundering laws to automated protocols would be structurally incompatible.

The DeFi Education Fund (DEF) has urged the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority to adopt a narrow, functional definition of “control” as it finalizes new rules for crypto asset activities.

The Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group argued that regulatory obligations should hinge on whether an entity has unilateral authority over user funds or transactions, not merely whether it developed or contributed to a decentralized protocol, in a response to an FCA consultation paper shared exclusively with CoinDesk.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters
Sign me up

“Control should be the determinative factor” of regulatory scope, DEF said, warning that software developers could otherwise be swept into intermediary-style obligations despite lacking custody or transactional authority.

The submission focuses on an area of the consultation which considers how decentralized finance (DeFi) arrangements should be treated under the U.K.’s emerging crypto regime. DEF supports the FCA’s control-based approach in principle but says it must be tied to concrete operational powers, such as the ability to initiate or block transactions, modify protocol parameters or exclude users.

DEF is an organization focused on informing policymakers and regulators about the benefits of DeFi and has been one of the prominent lobby groups on the road to crypto regulatory frameworks being established in Washington in recent years.

The group also challenged the FCA’s framing of DeFi-specific risks, arguing that cybersecurity vulnerabilities are not unique to blockchain systems and that public blockchains offer transparency advantages in combating illicit finance.

Applying prudential, reporting and platform access requirements designed for centralized trading platforms to non-custodial, automated protocols would be “ill-suited,” DEF said.

The FCA is seeking to bring a broad range of crypto activities within its regulatory perimeter as the U.K. moves toward a comprehensive digital asset framework.

Read More: UK regulators start major consultation on crypto listings, DeFi, and staking

FCADeFi Education FundDeFi
AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

More For You

Accelerating Convergence Between Traditional and On-Chain Finance in 2026?

Read full story

More For You

PGI Global CEO handed 20-year sentence for $200 million bitcoin, forex Ponzi scheme

Instead of investing in bitcoin and foreign currency trading, as promised, Palafox used new investor funds to pay old ones and siphoned millions for personal use.

What to know:

  • Ramil Ventura Palafox, founder of Praetorian Group International, ran a Ponzi scheme that misled over 90,000 investors and drained over $62.7 million.
  • Instead of investing in bitcoin and forex trading as promised, Palafox used new investor funds to pay old ones and siphoned millions for personal use.
  • Palafox spent millions on luxury cars, homes and designer items, while fabricating investment returns on an online portal.
Read full story
Latest Crypto News

Ethereum Foundation leadership shake-up: Tomasz Stańczak out as co-executive director

CoinDesk 20 performance update: Uniswap (UNI) jumps 5.4%, leading index higher

Crypto market wobbles as investors ignore good news, look for ‘exit ramp’

Ark Invest buys $18 million of crypto stocks including 10th consecutive Bullish purchase

Bitcoin, ether little changed before U.S. inflation report

PGI Global CEO handed 20-year sentence for $200 million bitcoin, forex Ponzi scheme

Top Stories

Recapping Consensus Hong Kong

Wall Street analysts cut Coinbase price targets following Q4 earnings miss

Bitcoin’s long-term rally is ‘broken’ until it reclaims $85,000, Deribit executive says

Crypto execs Armstrong, Garlinghouse among many named to U.S. CFTC advisory group

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.00115
$0.00115$0.00115
-1.79%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.