Crypto Civil War Kyle Samani Blasts Hyperliquid as Everything Wrong With Crypto

Crypto Industry Divided as Kyle Samani Slams Hyperliquid as “Everything Wrong With Crypto”

A sharp new debate is rippling through the crypto industry after prominent investor Kyle Samani, chairman of Forward Industries, publicly criticized the fast-growing trading platform Hyperliquid, calling it “everything wrong with crypto.”

Samani’s remarks, which also referenced Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan, did not include detailed technical accusations. However, the blunt phrasing immediately sparked discussion across the digital asset community, with many interpreting the comments as a broader critique of deeper structural issues within the crypto ecosystem.

The statement was first highlighted through information shared by Coin Bureau on X and later reviewed by the hokanews editorial team as part of its ongoing coverage of major industry debates.

Source: XPost

A Provocative Statement That Lit a Fire

Samani’s choice of words stood out not because of their length, but because of their intensity. Describing a single platform as representing “everything wrong with crypto” is an unusually strong claim in an industry accustomed to sharp competition and ideological divides.

While Samani did not elaborate publicly on specific flaws, his comments were widely interpreted as touching on long-running tensions around decentralization, incentive structures, governance, and power concentration.

“In crypto, what you don’t say can matter as much as what you do say,” noted one industry analyst. “Statements like this often reflect frustrations that go beyond a single project.”

What Is Hyperliquid

Hyperliquid has quickly gained attention as a high-performance crypto trading platform, particularly among derivatives traders. Known for its speed and user experience, the platform has attracted significant volume and a growing user base in a relatively short period of time.

Supporters argue that Hyperliquid represents the next generation of crypto trading infrastructure, designed to compete with centralized exchanges while leveraging blockchain technology.

Critics, however, have questioned whether some platforms marketed as crypto-native truly align with the core principles that originally defined the space.

The Deeper Debate Behind the Criticism

Although Samani did not provide a detailed breakdown, many observers believe his remarks point to broader concerns that have resurfaced repeatedly in crypto’s evolution.

These include questions about how much control founders and early insiders retain, whether incentive models reward long-term participation or short-term speculation, and how closely some platforms resemble traditional financial systems they initially set out to disrupt.

“Crypto has always wrestled with its identity,” said a blockchain governance researcher. “Is it about permissionless systems and user sovereignty, or about efficiency and scale at any cost”

Samani’s comments appear to tap into this unresolved tension.

Industry Reaction Split

Reaction from the crypto community has been mixed. Some investors and developers echoed Samani’s skepticism, arguing that parts of the industry have drifted away from decentralization in favor of speed, profits, and market dominance.

Others pushed back, suggesting that critiques without specifics risk oversimplifying complex design tradeoffs.

“You can’t build usable systems without compromise,” said a developer familiar with decentralized trading platforms. “The question is where you draw the line.”

So far, neither Hyperliquid nor Jeff Yan has issued a public response addressing Samani’s remarks directly.

Founder and Control Questions

Founders have always played an outsized role in crypto projects, particularly in their early stages. However, as platforms grow, scrutiny often increases around governance structures and decision-making power.

Critics argue that excessive founder influence can undermine decentralization, even if the technology itself is open or transparent. Supporters counter that strong leadership is necessary to guide projects through rapid growth and intense competition.

Samani’s comments have reignited this debate, highlighting how sensitive the topic remains within the industry.

Why This Matters Beyond One Platform

While the criticism was directed at Hyperliquid, many analysts believe the implications are much broader. The debate reflects a wider reckoning within crypto as the industry matures and attracts more capital, users, and regulatory attention.

As crypto platforms increasingly resemble traditional financial institutions in scale and influence, questions about values, governance, and user alignment are becoming harder to ignore.

“This isn’t just about one exchange or one founder,” said a venture capitalist focused on blockchain infrastructure. “It’s about what kind of industry crypto wants to be.”

Market Impact So Far

At the time of reporting, there has been no immediate, measurable market impact directly linked to Samani’s comments. Trading activity on Hyperliquid has continued, and broader crypto markets showed no unusual volatility tied specifically to the remarks.

However, industry watchers say reputational narratives can take time to influence perception, particularly among institutional investors and developers choosing where to build.

Media Confirmation and Reporting

The remarks were initially circulated by Coin Bureau on X and later cited by hokanews as part of its coverage of crypto industry discourse. As is common in such cases, the comments have sparked more discussion than formal responses, underscoring how influential individual voices remain in shaping narratives.

No additional clarification has been issued by Samani beyond the original statement.

What Comes Next

Whether this episode leads to a deeper public debate or fades into the constant churn of crypto discourse remains to be seen. Much may depend on whether Samani or others expand on the criticism with concrete examples, or whether Hyperliquid chooses to respond.

For now, the exchange serves as another reminder that crypto’s internal debates about values, structure, and direction are far from settled.

Conclusion

Kyle Samani’s claim that Hyperliquid represents “everything wrong with crypto” has struck a nerve across the industry, reopening long-standing questions about decentralization, control, and incentives.

Confirmed through information shared by Coin Bureau and cited by hokanews, the remarks highlight growing introspection within the crypto space as it moves from its experimental roots toward a more mature, high-stakes global industry. Whether the criticism leads to meaningful change or simply fuels debate, it underscores a fundamental truth: crypto is still defining what it wants to stand for.

hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.

Writer @Ethan
Ethan Collins is a passionate crypto journalist and blockchain enthusiast, always on the hunt for the latest trends shaking up the digital finance world. With a knack for turning complex blockchain developments into engaging, easy-to-understand stories, he keeps readers ahead of the curve in the fast-paced crypto universe. Whether it’s Bitcoin, Ethereum, or emerging altcoins, Ethan dives deep into the markets to uncover insights, rumors, and opportunities that matter to crypto fans everywhere.

Disclaimer:

The articles on HOKANEWS are here to keep you updated on the latest buzz in crypto, tech, and beyond—but they’re not financial advice. We’re sharing info, trends, and insights, not telling you to buy, sell, or invest. Always do your own homework before making any money moves.

HOKANEWS isn’t responsible for any losses, gains, or chaos that might happen if you act on what you read here. Investment decisions should come from your own research—and, ideally, guidance from a qualified financial advisor. Remember: crypto and tech move fast, info changes in a blink, and while we aim for accuracy, we can’t promise it’s 100% complete or up-to-date.