This article was first published on The Bit Journal. Bitcoin ETF losses have climbed to $7 billion as the cryptocurrency slips below important price levels, raisingThis article was first published on The Bit Journal. Bitcoin ETF losses have climbed to $7 billion as the cryptocurrency slips below important price levels, raising

Bitcoin ETF Holders Face $7B Loss as BTC Risks Drop to $65K

6 min read

This article was first published on The Bit Journal.

Bitcoin ETF losses have climbed to $7 billion as the cryptocurrency slips below important price levels, raising concerns about how US spot Bitcoin ETFs and the broader market will hold up. This decline has put many US spot Bitcoin ETF investors in significant unrealized losses, showing that both institutional and retail participants are feeling the strain.

During the past weekend, Bitcoin (BTC) dropped to $74,609 before recovering and is currently trading at $78,775.77. Market experts note that if demand does not pick up, continued ETF outflows could drive Bitcoin down toward $65,000, adding further pressure on the market.

What Are Bitcoin ETF Outflows and Why Do They Matter?

Bitcoin ETF outflows show the unrealized drop in value for investors holding spot Bitcoin ETFs. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, noted that this price performance indicates Bitcoin is trading below the average cost basis of US ETFs, which can influence investor behavior and increase market volatility.

Unlike self-custody holders, ETF investors, including advisors and institutional allocators, often adjust their portfolios following strict rules, and falling prices can trigger sell-to-even actions.

Bitcoin ETF ChartBitcoin ETF Holders Face $7B Loss as BTC Risks Drop to $65K 3

Across 12 US spot Bitcoin ETFs, the average purchase price is around $90,200 per Bitcoin, reflecting a paper loss of roughly 15%. Jim Bianco of Bianco Research calculated a combined average purchase price of $85,360 per Bitcoin, implying an average loss of about $8,000 per BTC, totaling roughly $7 billion for ETF holders.

Who Is Most Affected by the Losses?

ETF investors who bought Bitcoin at higher prices are mostly underwater. Jim Bianco of Bianco Research pointed out that the 12 spot Bitcoin ETFs together hold around 1.29 million BTC, valued at more than $115 billion. This represents roughly 6.5% of all Bitcoin in circulation.

When combined with corporate holdings such as Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, the total reaches about 10% of the Bitcoin supply. Strategy has an unrealized profit of $1.17 billion, with an average purchase price of $76,020 per Bitcoin, while ETF investors, having paid higher prices, are facing losses. James Check of Checkonchain added that 62% of ETF inflows are now underwater, showing the extent of the correction for these funds.

How Are Outflows Driving Bitcoin Price?

US spot Bitcoin ETFs are seeing significant net outflows, totaling roughly $6.18 billion between November 2025 and January 2026, marking the longest consecutive outflow period since their 2024 launch. Redemptions often happen in large bursts, with net redemptions exceeding $1.3 billion during the last two trading days of January.

The 12 spot ETFs also experienced a nine-day outflow streak, though it was punctuated by a modest inflow of $6.3 million, showing that ETF flows are not entirely one-directional and can vary day to day. 

Bianco highlighted that the average trade size for Bitcoin ETFs is just $15,800, much smaller than the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust at $111,300 and SPDR Gold Shares at $87,000, indicating that ETF activity is more retail-driven and more sensitive to price swings. If the ETF complex continues to shed more than $6 billion every three months, the implied monthly net outflow is roughly $2 billion, which at a Bitcoin price of $75,000 corresponds to 27,000–28,000 BTC that the market must absorb each month.

K33 Research found that Bitcoin’s price remains closely tied to ETF flows, with an R-squared of 0.80, meaning ETF activity explains around 80% of 30-day BTC price changes. These factors show how Bitcoin ETF losses can amplify selling pressure, create a feedback loop, and increase short-term volatility.

How Could ETF Redemptions Affect Bitcoin’s Price?

Ongoing ETF redemptions put significant pressure on Bitcoin’s price. If net outflows of $2 billion per month continue, the market would need to absorb an extra 27,000 to 28,000 BTC each month at a $75,000 price level. This is much higher than new supply from the 2024 halving, which adds roughly 13,500 BTC per month.

Analysts say that if ETF outflows stay at this pace, it would be like absorbing two months of new supply every month unless other buyers step in. Alphractal CEO Joao Wedson noted that if redemptions keep going, Bitcoin could face strong headwinds and fall toward a key support level of $65,500.

Can ETFs Stabilize the Market?

While Bitcoin ETF losses are substantial, the market could stabilize if flows return to normal. Analysis indicates that mid-$75,000s could act as temporary support.

Bitcoin ETF LossesBitcoin ETF Holders Face $7B Loss as BTC Risks Drop to $65K 4

If investors buy at these levels, ETFs might shift from adding selling pressure to becoming marginal buyers. However, if redemptions continue, the current paper loss trend could persist, leaving Bitcoin ETF investors underwater and keeping downward pressure on BTC.

Conclusion 

Bitcoin ETF losses of $7 billion highlight the delicate balance between ETF flows, investor decisions, and Bitcoin pricing. With 12 major US spot ETFs holding a significant portion of BTC, ongoing outflows could push prices down toward $65,000.

Experts stress the importance of closely watching ETF activity, as continued redemptions could shape the market’s direction in the near term. While temporary support levels may provide relief, the interaction between ETFs and Bitcoin price remains a key factor for both institutional and retail investors.

Glossary 

Spot Bitcoin ETF: An ETF that holds real Bitcoin and follows its live price.

Paper Loss: A loss on an investment that hasn’t been sold yet.

Underwater: When an investment is worth less than what was paid for it.

Outflows / Redemptions: Money pulled from ETFs, which can trigger Bitcoin sales.

Average Cost Basis: The average price investors paid for their Bitcoin.

Frequently Asked Questions About Bitcoin ETF Outflows 

How much have US Bitcoin ETF investors lost?

US Bitcoin ETF investors have lost about $7 billion on paper, which is roughly 15% of their holdings.

Why are ETF investors underwater?

Many ETF investors bought Bitcoin at higher prices, around $90,200 per coin, while the current price is about $78,775.

How much Bitcoin do the 12 US spot ETFs hold?

The 12 US spot ETFs hold about 1.29 million BTC, which is around 6.5% of all Bitcoin in circulation.

Could ETF redemptions push Bitcoin even lower?

Yes, if ETF outflows continue at $2 billion per month, Bitcoin may drop toward $65,500 unless new buyers enter the market.

Which investors are most affected?

ETF investors who bought Bitcoin recently at high prices are most affected, while earlier buyers like corporate holders face smaller losses.

Sources

Cryptoslate

Coinmarketcap 

Coinmarketcap

Read More: Bitcoin ETF Holders Face $7B Loss as BTC Risks Drop to $65K">Bitcoin ETF Holders Face $7B Loss as BTC Risks Drop to $65K

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Taiko and Chainlink to Unleash Reliable Onchain Data for DeFi Ecosystem

Taiko and Chainlink to Unleash Reliable Onchain Data for DeFi Ecosystem

Taiko and Chainlink Data Streams to deliver secure, high-speed onchain data by empowering next-generation DeFi protocols and institutional-grade adoption.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 06:10
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

The post One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew returns to the Jazz Albums and Traditional Jazz Albums charts, showing continued demand for his timeless music. Frank Sinatra performs on his TV special Frank Sinatra: A Man and his Music Bettmann Archive These days on the Billboard charts, Frank Sinatra’s music can always be found on the jazz-specific rankings. While the art he created when he was still working was pop at the time, and later classified as traditional pop, there is no such list for the latter format in America, and so his throwback projects and cuts appear on jazz lists instead. It’s on those charts where Sinatra rebounds this week, and one of his popular projects returns not to one, but two tallies at the same time, helping him increase the total amount of real estate he owns at the moment. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew Returns Sinatra’s The World We Knew is a top performer again, if only on the jazz lists. That set rebounds to No. 15 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart and comes in at No. 20 on the all-encompassing Jazz Albums ranking after not appearing on either roster just last frame. The World We Knew’s All-Time Highs The World We Knew returns close to its all-time peak on both of those rosters. Sinatra’s classic has peaked at No. 11 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart, just missing out on becoming another top 10 for the crooner. The set climbed all the way to No. 15 on the Jazz Albums tally and has now spent just under two months on the rosters. Frank Sinatra’s Album With Classic Hits Sinatra released The World We Knew in the summer of 1967. The title track, which on the album is actually known as “The World We Knew (Over and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:02