Ethereum went through a sharp deleveraging event on January 31, marked by aggressive downside continuation and a rapid breakdown in bullish positioning.
Price fell decisively from the $3,000 psychological zone into the $2,350 area, triggering widespread long liquidations and confirming a clear shift in short-term market structure.
This move did not unfold as a slow correction. Instead, it reflected a fast-moving liquidation cascade, where leverage rather than spot selling became the dominant driver. The speed and scale of the drawdown signal a market that had become structurally fragile after an extended period of positioning buildup.
Ethereum failed to hold above the $3,000 level, which had acted as a psychological and structural pivot in recent weeks. Once price lost acceptance above that zone, downside momentum accelerated quickly.
The chart shows ETH sliding through intermediate support and finding temporary stabilization near $2,350, which now stands out as the immediate downside reference. This level marks the area where forced liquidations peaked and price briefly paused, suggesting that selling pressure was driven more by leverage unwinds than sustained spot distribution.
On the upside, the $2,750–$2,800 region emerges as the first area where prior support turned into resistance. A broader resistance band sits again near $3,000, which remains the key level ETH would need to reclaim to invalidate the current bearish structure. Until that happens, rebounds should be viewed as reactive rather than impulsive.
On-chain data from CryptoQuant confirms the severity of the move. According to the Ethereum Long Liquidations (All Exchanges) chart, total long liquidations surged to approximately $485 million, making this the second-largest liquidation event since October 10.
Such a spike is characteristic of a full leverage flush. It typically reflects the forced closure of overextended long positions after a prolonged buildup, effectively resetting derivatives positioning. Events of this magnitude often coincide with local exhaustion in selling pressure, though they do not guarantee immediate trend reversals.
A notable divergence appears when isolating Binance-specific data. While global liquidations reached nearly half a billion dollars, Binance recorded only around $40 million in long liquidations during the same window.
This means Binance accounted for less than 10% of total global liquidations, a significant discrepancy that suggests leverage concentration was far heavier on other derivatives venues. The implication is not that Binance was immune to the move, but that traders elsewhere were materially more overexposed heading into the breakdown.
This imbalance helps explain why the liquidation cascade was so abrupt, as risk was unevenly distributed across platforms rather than broadly shared.
From here, the market faces two primary paths.
On the constructive side, holding above $2,350 would allow price to stabilize after the leverage reset, with any recovery needing acceptance back above $2,750–$2,800 to signal improving structure. A reclaim of $3,000 would be required to fully negate the bearish implications of the recent breakdown.
On the risk side, failure to hold the $2,350 area would expose ETH to deeper downside continuation, as the level currently represents the last visible stabilization point following the liquidation spike. A clean break below it would suggest that forced selling has not yet fully exhausted.
This move was less about sentiment and more about structure. Ethereum entered January with leverage stacked unevenly across exchanges, and the drop below $3,000 acted as the trigger that unwound that imbalance. The resulting liquidation event has significantly reduced speculative pressure, but price remains below key resistance levels.
For now, the market appears to be in a post-capitulation phase, where stabilization is possible, but confirmation will depend on whether ETH can reclaim lost structure rather than merely bounce from oversold conditions.
The post Ethereum Longs Get Wiped as Liquidations Expose Leverage Imbalance appeared first on ETHNews.

