A US winter storm knocked Bitcoin hashrate to a 7‑month low as miners powered down to ease grid stress, even as BTC, ETH and SOL prices stayed relatively calm. A US winter storm knocked Bitcoin hashrate to a 7‑month low as miners powered down to ease grid stress, even as BTC, ETH and SOL prices stayed relatively calm.

Bitcoin hashrate slumps 40% in two days as US winter storm hits miners

2026/01/27 19:32
3 min read

A US winter storm knocked Bitcoin hashrate to a 7‑month low as miners powered down to ease grid stress, even as BTC, ETH and SOL prices stayed relatively calm.

Summary
  • A powerful US winter storm drove Bitcoin hashrate down about 40% in two days to roughly 663 EH/s, before a rebound toward 854 EH/s.​
  • Miner Abundant Mines says around 40% of global capacity briefly went offline, underscoring miners’ role as “flexible load” during grid stress.​
  • Despite the shock, Bitcoin trades near 87,913 dollars, Ethereum around 2,930 dollars and Solana near 124.57 dollars over the past 24 hours.

Bitcoin’s (BTC) mining network just endured a stark reminder that it ultimately answers to the weather, not the market. Over the weekend, a powerful winter storm sweeping across the United States pushed Bitcoin’s hashrate to its lowest level in seven months, as miners throttled or shut down rigs to relieve pressure on stressed power grids.

Bitcoin hash rate tumbles to 7-month low after winter storm pounds the US

According to AccuWeather, the storm hammered more than three dozen US states with heavy snow, ice and sub-zero temperatures, leaving roughly one million customers without electricity. Against that backdrop, data from analytics platform CoinWarz show Bitcoin’s computing power began sliding on Friday before “plunging sharply” over the weekend to around 663 exahashes per second (EH/s) by Sunday, a drawdown of more than 40% in just two days. The network has since staged a partial recovery, rebounding to about 854 EH/s as of Monday.​

Oregon-based miner Abundant Mines called the shock “significant,” estimating that “approximately 40% of global Bitcoin mining capacity has gone offline in the past 24 hours due to extreme winter weather,” with many operators voluntarily reducing output as demand spiked. The company framed this flexibility as a structural edge, arguing that mining farms can shut down rapidly during grid stress and restart just as fast when conditions normalize. That dynamic was especially visible in the US, which Hashrate Index estimates now contributes nearly 38% of total global hashrate and hosts at least 137 crypto-mining facilities, according to a 2024 report from the Energy Information Administration.

Industry advocates say this episode strengthens the case that miners act as “flexible load” for power systems instead of being pure parasites. Mining operations can absorb excess electricity from wind and solar during off-peak periods, then power down almost instantly when demand surges. Bitcoin ESG researcher Daniel Batten noted on X that demand response programs involving miners helped stabilize the Texas grid during the storm, as operators curtailed usage to free up capacity for households and critical infrastructure.​

The hashrate shock comes as crypto prices trade in far calmer fashion. Bitcoin is changing hands near 88,261 dollars today, up modestly from roughly 86,567 dollars 24 hours earlier. Ether trades around 2,923 dollars, edging about 0.3% higher day-on-day. Solana sits near 124.3 dollars after a roughly 1.4% gain over the past 24 hours. For miners, however, the past weekend was less about price action and more about proving—once again—that their business is tightly coupled to real-world weather and grid conditions, not just digital charts.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
US-wed Irishman with no criminal record detained for months in 'traumatizing' conditions

US-wed Irishman with no criminal record detained for months in 'traumatizing' conditions

An Irish immigrant has been stuck in an ICE camp for months despite having a valid permit and no criminal record, per an interview he gave to The Irish Times, likening
Share
Alternet2026/02/10 03:14
U.S. government isn’t poised to sweep in with bitcoin buys, despite Jim Cramer rumor

U.S. government isn’t poised to sweep in with bitcoin buys, despite Jim Cramer rumor

The post U.S. government isn’t poised to sweep in with bitcoin buys, despite Jim Cramer rumor appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. President Donald Trump’s U.S.
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/10 03:42