The post SEC Takes More Time on Pudgy Penguins and T. Rowe Crypto ETFs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The SEC also opened a public comment period on optionsThe post SEC Takes More Time on Pudgy Penguins and T. Rowe Crypto ETFs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The SEC also opened a public comment period on options

SEC Takes More Time on Pudgy Penguins and T. Rowe Crypto ETFs

The SEC also opened a public comment period on options linked to the Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF. At the same time, market flows turned decisively negative, with spot Bitcoin ETFs posting $681 million in net outflows over the first full trading week of the year and Ethereum ETFs seeing smaller redemptions. Analysts attribute the pullback largely to macroeconomic uncertainty, as expectations for near-term interest rate cuts faded and geopolitical risks rose. Despite the near-term slowdown, institutional engagement is still gaining momentum, with Morgan Stanley filing for new Bitcoin and Solana ETFs and Bank of America expanding adviser access to Bitcoin ETFs.

Crypto ETF Momentum Cools

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) extended decision deadlines on two proposed ETFs while opening a public comment period on options tied to a third product. The moves were disclosed in separate Federal Register filings on Monday.

In two of the filings, the SEC designated a longer review period under the standard 19b-4 process, which allows the agency to extend its initial decision window by up to 45 days. One proposal would permit the listing of the Canary Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) ETF on Cboe BZX, while the other involves the T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF on NYSE Arca. 

SEC’s Federal Register filing

These extensions do not suggest approval or rejection, but rather indicate that the commission wants more time to evaluate issues like market structure, investor protection, and the potential for manipulation.

The Canary PENGU ETF is among the most unconventional crypto-linked products currently under consideration. It seeks exposure to the Pudgy Penguins ecosystem, which is a high-profile NFT collection that expanded into licensing, consumer products, and tokenized initiatives. Meanwhile, the T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF would be an actively managed fund investing across a basket of digital assets beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Alongside these delays, the SEC also acknowledged a proposed rule change by NYSE American to list standardized options on the Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF. That filing has entered the public comment phase, inviting feedback on whether options trading on the fund would align with Exchange Act requirements for fair and orderly markets and adequate safeguards against fraud and manipulation. The underlying index tracks five large-cap digital assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Cardano.

Top 10 cryptos by market cap (Source: CoinCodex)

If approved, options on a multi-asset crypto ETF will be an expansion of crypto-linked derivatives in US markets that offers investors new tools for hedging and leverage beyond the Bitcoin- and Ethereum-focused products that dominate today. For now, the SEC is neither shutting the door on innovation nor rushing approvals, but instead carefully pacing decisions as the crypto ETF space grows.

Crypto ETF Flows Turn Negative

In addition to crypto ETF approval delays, spot crypto ETFs began 2026 under pressure, with investor flows turning sharply negative after a brief burst of early optimism. Data from SoSoValue shows that spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a combined $681 million in net outflows over the first full trading week of the year. 

This is a decisive reversal from the inflows seen at the very start of January. The pullback unfolded over four consecutive trading days, with the heaviest redemptions concentrated midweek.

Weekly Bitcoin ETF flows (Source: SoSoValue)

The largest single-day outflow occurred on Wednesday, when Bitcoin ETF products shed roughly $486 million. That was followed by an additional $398.9 million in net redemptions on Thursday and $249.9 million on Friday. These losses more than offset the strong start to the year, which saw inflows of about $471 million on Jan. 2 and a further $697.2 million on Jan. 5. 

Spot Ethereum ETFs followed a similar pattern, though on a smaller scale. Over the same week, Ethereum-focused funds posted net outflows of approximately $68.6 million, ending the period with total net assets of around $18.7 billion. 

Weekly Ethereum ETF flows (Source: SoSoValue)

Vincent Liu, chief investment officer at Kronos Research, attributed the downturn primarily to macroeconomic uncertainty. He said changing expectations around interest rate cuts and rising geopolitical risks dampened risk appetite across markets, with crypto caught in the spillover. Investors, according to Liu, are now closely watching upcoming US Consumer Price Index data and guidance from the Federal Reserve for clearer signals on when monetary easing might resume.

Despite the volatility, longer-term institutional engagement with crypto ETFs is still growing. Morgan Stanley filed with the US SEC to launch two spot crypto ETFs, one tracking Bitcoin and another tied to Solana. Separately, Bank of America recently began allowing advisers in its wealth management units to recommend exposure to select Bitcoin ETFs. Even amid short-term outflows, large financial institutions are still laying groundwork for crypto adoption.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/13682/sec-takes-more-time-on-pudgy-penguins-and-t-rowe-crypto-et-fs

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.000606
$0.000606$0.000606
-9.72%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
SEC Approves Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund for Trading

SEC Approves Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund for Trading

SEC greenlights GDLC, the first U.S.-listed multi-asset crypto ETF, offering exposure to BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL and ADA.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/09/18 17:55
‘Scam’ claims spread after Trump’s Super Bowl crypto donation pitch

‘Scam’ claims spread after Trump’s Super Bowl crypto donation pitch

AI concerns and lack of disclosure sparked controversy, raising questions about legality, ethics, and campaign transparency rules.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/09 20:15