In 2025, crypto hacks totaled $3.4B across 300+ incidents, where social-engineering and access-control failures dominated. Let's look at the major ones. The postIn 2025, crypto hacks totaled $3.4B across 300+ incidents, where social-engineering and access-control failures dominated. Let's look at the major ones. The post

Biggest Crypto Hacks of 2025

2025 was a bruising year for cybersecurity in digital assets, ending with over $3.4 billion in crypto stolen across hundreds of incidents. Independent tallies show over 300 major security incidents for the year. At least $2 million of those thefts was attributed to North Korean hackers, mainly in the Bybit hack case.

Below are the five biggest heists of 2025, including one driven primarily by social engineering.

Bybit: $1.5b (February 2025)

U.S. authorities attributed the largest crypto theft in history to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Investigators said attackers took control of a cold ETH wallet, then rapidly laundered funds across chains via BTC $88 282 24h volatility: 0.9% Market cap: $1.76 T Vol. 24h: $40.38 B and other currencies. Exchange disclosures and later forensic analysis showed that large portions were routed through THORChain and split across tens of thousands of addresses.

According to a later report by Crystal Intelligence, the attack Bybit faced was a sophisticated operation that compromised its frontend, thereby tricking employees into believing they were signing legitimate transactions. WazirX and Phemex were hacked similarly.

Following the incident, Bybit launched a 10% recovery bounty and engaged blockchain investigators to help freeze the stolen funds. Portions were tracked, though most remain in motion.

Cetus DEX (Sui): $220m (May)

Sui’s largest DEX and liquidity provider, Cetus, was drained $220 million in just 15 minutes. According to Merkle Science, the hackers did not exploit a smart contract vulnerability, which is typical in the industry. Instead, they benefited from a rounding bug in a third-party math library, used for liquidity and pricing calculations.

An attacker abused a rounding/MSB-check flaw to manipulate pool parameters and extract assets. Teams moved quickly to pause contracts and later claimed that around $160 million had been frozen or recovered.

However, more than $60M remained at risk. This was the year’s most significant DeFi exploit and briefly halted trading in the Sui ecosystem.

Balancer: $116m (November)

A breach in Balancer, a popular DeFi protocol, was initially spotted by crypto sleuths on X. An attacker exploited a rounding bug in Balancer V2’s stable pool logic across Ethereum and several L2s and sidechains. Balancer’s disclosure confirms the technical root cause.

The initial estimates placed losses near $120, with the bulk on the Ethereum mainnet. Moreover, a dormant whale withdrew $6,5 million just after the hack. Balancer’s Total Value Locked (TVL) halved from $442 million to $214.5 million in a single day.

However, according to Crystal Intelligence, most of the funds were traced. The wallets are now closely monitored for potential transactions to freeze the stolen funds.

Phemex (CEX): $73m (January)

Phemex, a centralized exchange (CEX) based in Singapore, saw its hot-wallet compromised across 16 chains. Security firms flagged dozens of suspicious outflows from Phemex hot wallets spanning major networks.

This was the first big hack of 2025 that shook the community. Prominent expert on X, ZachXBT, who participated in the Bybit investigation, proved that the Phemex and Bybit attacks were carried out by Lazarus and used similar addresses.

After the incident, the company completely halted deposits and withdrawals, but by February, services were fully resumed with additional security hardening.

Upbit (CEX): over $30m (November)

South Korea’s largest exchange, Upbit, reported a hack in November, with a total impact of 44.5 billion won (around $34 million). Customers were made whole from reserves, while 5.9B ($4 million) in Upbit corporate funds was lost. Just a small portion of $1.77 million got frozen through tracing.

Upbit halted Solana flows, moved funds to cold storage, coordinated freezes with issuers/exchanges, and gradually reopened wallets using new deposit addresses. Even with reimbursement, the incident underscored CeFi’s concentration risk.

2025 Crypto Hacks in Numbers

  • Total stolen: $3.3-3.4 billion (range reflects differing methodologies across Chainalysis and Beosin/Footprint).
  • Incident count: ~313 major cases (Beosin/Footprint).
  • H1 snapshot: around $2.5 billion stolen across over 300 incidents. According to CertiK, this already exceeds the total for 2024.
  • Typical attacks: compromised wallets and phishing/social engineering were material drivers.
  • Platforms targeted: A few infrastructure-level attacks dominated losses (e.g., Bybit), while overall DeFi incident counts remained much higher, though with more minor losses.

Why Social Engineering Mattered More

In general, security firms noted a shift toward human-factor and supply-chain compromises. Hackers moved from poisoned frontends and multisig UI tricks to executive impersonation and key theft, thus reducing the relative share of pure solidity bugs. 2025’s outlier losses were overwhelmingly due to access-control failures, not to novel on-chain math.

next

The post Biggest Crypto Hacks of 2025 appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Market Opportunity
LOOK Logo
LOOK Price(LOOK)
$0.01901
$0.01901$0.01901
+2.53%
USD
LOOK (LOOK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shiba Inu Supply Shrinks as 167,991,300,000 SHIB Exit Exchanges

Shiba Inu Supply Shrinks as 167,991,300,000 SHIB Exit Exchanges

The post Shiba Inu Supply Shrinks as 167,991,300,000 SHIB Exit Exchanges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. -167,991,300,000 SHIB in exchange netflow Shiba Inu
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/01 04:42
Kan de Solana koers naar $129 door grote SOL ETF instroom en hoge netwerkinkomsten?

Kan de Solana koers naar $129 door grote SOL ETF instroom en hoge netwerkinkomsten?

Solana sluit 2025 af met meer dan $1,5 miljard aan netwerkinkomsten. Daarmee laat het netwerk Ethereum en Hyperliquid samen achter zich. Deze cijfers van Blockworks
Share
Coinstats2026/01/01 03:16
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41