The post Bitcoin (BTC) Price Prediction: Thesis Plays Out with Breakout Toward $90K+ (Dec 29 TA) appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. As expected, the $BTC priceThe post Bitcoin (BTC) Price Prediction: Thesis Plays Out with Breakout Toward $90K+ (Dec 29 TA) appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. As expected, the $BTC price

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Prediction: Thesis Plays Out with Breakout Toward $90K+ (Dec 29 TA)

As expected, the $BTC price has broken out. After pushing through the convergence of the major ascending trendline, and the downtrend, the price emerged to the upside on Monday morning, with a quick rally to $90,000. Given that this is strong horizontal resistance, the price has stalled at this level. What’s next?

Is money leaving silver for $BTC?

Source: TradingView

The silver chart possibly has something to do with the current $BTC breakout. After opening on Sunday night with another big surge, the silver price hit $84 and an ascending trendline. This was enough to reject the price and $10 was lost in quick succession. 

It can be observed in the daily chart above that the price has come back to $74 where a bit of a bounce is taking place. Could it be that speculative money left silver and entered a very beaten down Bitcoin? Gold also fell around 1.8% overnight.

A strong breakout – rejected at $90,000

Source: TradingView

The 4-hour chart for $BTC shows that the price would appear to have broken out strongly, after remaining below the major trendline for the entire weekend. However, the price has been rejected from the strong $90,000 horizontal resistance level, and is now breaking back below the $89,500 resistance.

There was a reasonable volume spike for the breakout candle in this time frame, but since then, volume has begun to decrease for the last two 4-hour candles. Of course, a test of the major trendline probably needs to take place, and it might be that the price even comes below to test the downtrend breakout.

The Stochastic RSI indicators look as though they could go along with this thesis, as they are angling down from the top now. 

A breakout test to happen imminently

Source: TradingView

The daily chart reveals that the $BTC price has continued to decline from the $90,000 resistance level and has almost reached the major ascending trendline and the $88,000 horizontal support. A test of the major trendline is probably going to happen imminently. 

It could be that the bears take this opportunity to force the price back through the ascending trendline and even back under the downtrend in order to complete a big fakeout. 

For the bulls, the Relative Strength Index is showing a breakout of the downtrend line. If the indicator line can remain above, this would certainly favour a continuance of the breakout in the price action.

Now the bounce?

Source: TradingView

In the weekly time frame the $BTC price can be seen to have now come all the way down to horizontal support at $88,000 and the major ascending trendline. Therefore a test of these important supports has now been made. It now remains to be seen if the price will bounce back to the upside. 

At time of going to press, the price is trying to bounce, but as mentioned earlier, there is the possibility that it could fall all the way down to the downtrend line and retest this. The next hour or two will tell us which of these two scenarios will play out, or even if a third scenario of a collapse could take place? 

All this said, a bounce from here, after a proper test of the breakout, is the more likely probability. Could this be the very beginning of a new upside leg for Bitcoin that eventually rallies strongly back towards the all-time high?

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Source: https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2025/12/bitcoin-btc-price-prediction-thesis-plays-out-with-breakout-toward-90k-dec-29-ta

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$88,935.97
$88,935.97$88,935.97
-0.08%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer […] The post Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 01:13
The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

PANews reported on December 31 that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) plans to study in 2026 whether certain crypto assets can be classified as cash
Share
PANews2025/12/31 16:50