RWA Rockets 185.8% as Gaming and DePIN Collapse, CoinGecko Data Finds

Real-world assets unexpectedly stole the show in crypto this year, posting gains that left most other sectors scrambling to keep up. According to CoinGecko’s “Crypto Narratives by Profitability 2025,” the RWA, short for real-world assets, theme climbed an eye-watering 185.76% on average, pushing it to the top of the leaderboard. That kind of outsize return caught many observers off guard and signaled a clear shift in where capital flowed during the year.

Not everyone shared that upside. Layer-1 blockchains, often the backbone of broader ecosystem activity, also had a good run and finished comfortably in the green with an average return of 80.31%. A smaller cluster the report labels “Made in USA” managed to eke out gains as well, up 30.62%, driven by a handful of notable winners inside that grouping. But outside these pockets of strength the market looked far less forgiving.

Some of the year’s most hyped corners fell hard. Gaming tokens, once a darling of retail traders and speculators, lost roughly 75.16% on average, while DePIN, projects promising to decentralize physical infrastructure, plunged about 76.74%. Those losses are a stark reminder that speculative enthusiasm can evaporate quickly when development timelines slip, user growth disappoints, or simply when investors rotate into what they see as safer or more yield-oriented narratives.

Crypto Rotation

What stands out in CoinGecko’s breakdown is the degree to which a few outsized performers can tilt the picture for an entire theme. In the RWA bucket, several tokens posted triple-digit gains that bumped up the category average; similarly, a late surge in certain layer-one networks helped buoy that narrative’s overall result.

In other words, headline percentages don’t tell the whole story, beneath them sits a lot of dispersion, with winners and losers sometimes sitting side by side within the same theme. For traders and longer-term investors alike, the takeaway is familiar but worth repeating: narrative strength doesn’t replace token-level research.

A theme can be enjoying fresh capital inflows while many projects inside it struggle with adoption or product-market fit. Conversely, beaten-down sectors can harbor individual projects that are quietly building real value. The broader pattern this year suggested a partial return of capital to tokens linked to tangible yield and infrastructure, while some of the flashier, consumer-facing ideas saw sentiment cool.

That rotation reflects both changing investor preferences and a market learning to be more selective after several years of wildly divergent returns across different parts of crypto. CoinGecko’s ranking offers a neat snapshot of that rotation but also serves as a caution: averages mask volatility. For anyone using these rankings as a starting point, the sensible next step is to drill down, look at token fundamentals, developer activity, on-chain metrics, and the realistic path to user growth.

In a market that can hand out double-digit winners and wipe out large chunks of value in short order, the old rules about risk management and due diligence still matter. If nothing else, this year’s leaderboard shows how quickly leadership in crypto can change, and how important it is to look past the headline numbers if you want to understand what’s really driving returns.