Deep and durable responses observed in a heavily pretreated, historically immunotherapy-resistant population Findings reinforce the broad, pan-tumor activity ofDeep and durable responses observed in a heavily pretreated, historically immunotherapy-resistant population Findings reinforce the broad, pan-tumor activity of

Agenus Reports Deep, Durable Responses with Botensilimab + Balstilimab in Highly Refractory Ovarian Cancer, Published in JITC

  • Deep and durable responses observed in a heavily pretreated, historically immunotherapy-resistant population
  • Findings reinforce the broad, pan-tumor activity of BOT+BAL across immunologically “cold” cancers

LEXINGTON, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–$AGEN #BAL—Agenus Inc. (Nasdaq: AGEN), a leader in immuno-oncology innovation, today announced the publication of clinical results from the ovarian cancer cohort of its Phase 1b C-800-01 trial evaluating botensilimab plus balstilimab (BOT+BAL) in The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC).

The peer-reviewed manuscript titled, “Botensilimab (Fc-enhanced anti–CTLA-4 antibody) plus balstilimab (anti–PD-1 antibody) in patients with treatment-refractory ovarian cancer,” is available online here.i

In this heavily pretreated population, BOT+BAL demonstrated clinically meaningful activity and durable benefit in women with treatment-refractory ovarian cancer, a population with few remaining options. The combination achieved a 23% overall response rate and 31% clinical benefit rate, including durable responses with a median duration of 9.7 months. Median overall survival reached 14.8 months, with an estimated of 75% of patients alive at 12 months.

These findings build on results from the broader C-800-01 dataset presented at ESMO 2025, where BOT+BAL showed activity across multiple refractory solid tumors. Collectively, these data reinforce the potential of BOT+BAL to generate meaningful immune responses in cancers historically considered unresponsive to immunotherapy.

High Unmet Need in Treatment-Refractory Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer causes approximately 13,000 deaths annually in the U.S. and 200,000 globallyii,iii, and outcomes are particularly poor once tumors become platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory. Therapy with first-generation checkpoint inhibitors has yielded modest responses, with objective response rates between 8–10% and median progression-free survival of roughly 2 monthsiv,v, leaving many women with rapidly diminishing options and no approved immunotherapy combinations.

Publication Highlights

  • The study enrolled 44 women with treatment-refractory ovarian cancer who had received multiple prior lines of therapy. Nearly three-quarters were platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory, and most had high-grade serous tumors.
  • Activity was demonstrated in primary platinum-refractory patients—a rare and high-risk group often excluded from clinical studies.
  • Responses occurred in multiple ovarian cancer subtypes including high-grade serous, clear cell, and endometrioid tumors.
  • The BOT+BAL combination demonstrated a manageable and reversible safety profile, consistent with CTLA-4 and PD-1 therapy. Most common treatment-related adverse events such as diarrhea/colitis (43%; 16% grade 3), fatigue and nausea (36%) were effectively managed using established treatment guidelines. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Steven O’Day, MD, Chief Medical Officer, Agenus, commented, “These results offer a meaningful signal of clinical activity for women with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, a group that has seen little therapeutic progress. Botensilimab’s unique immune activation profile translated into clinically significant responses in a population long considered resistant to immunotherapy. These findings strengthen our confidence in BOT+BAL’s potential and support moving this combination into larger, randomized studies.”

Rebecca Porter, M.D., Ph.D., Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Lead Author added, “These women faced some of the most treatment-resistant forms of ovarian cancer, yet several achieved meaningful and durable benefit. Seeing this level of activity in such a heavily pretreated population is encouraging and provides important insights to the field regarding therapy approaches for patients with very limited remaining options.”

Patient Access and Ongoing Development

BOT+BAL continues to advance through global clinical development across multiple tumor types. In parallel, eligible patients may be able to access BOT+BAL through regulatory-authorized early access mechanisms, including France’s AAC program, where treatment is reimbursed, as well as paid named-patient programs in select countries where permitted by local regulations. These programs are intended to provide access for patients with serious or life-threatening diseases who lack satisfactory therapeutic alternatives.

About Agenus

Agenus is a leading immuno-oncology company targeting cancer with a comprehensive pipeline of immunological agents. The company was founded in 1994 with a mission to expand patient populations benefiting from cancer immunotherapy through combination approaches, using a broad repertoire of antibody therapeutics, adoptive cell therapies (through MiNK Therapeutics) and adjuvants. Agenus has robust end-to-end development capabilities, across commercial and clinical cGMP manufacturing facilities, research and discovery, and a global clinical operations footprint. Agenus is headquartered in Lexington, MA. For more information, visit www.agenusbio.com or @agenus_bio. Information that may be important to investors will be routinely posted on our website and social media channels.

About the C-800-01 Study

C-800-01 (NCT03860272) is an ongoing, multicenter Phase 1b clinical trial evaluating botensilimab in combination with balstilimab across advanced solid tumors. The trial enrolled over 400 patients with refractory disease and included tumor types with limited or no responsiveness to prior checkpoint inhibitors. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results of the study were presented at ESMO 2025 and the full presentation is available on the publications page of the Agenus website here.

About Botensilimab (BOT)

Botensilimab (BOT) is a human Fc enhanced multifunctional anti-CTLA-4 antibody designed to boost both innate and adaptive anti-tumor immune responses. Its novel design leverages mechanisms of action to extend immunotherapy benefits to “cold” tumors which generally respond poorly to standard of care or are refractory to conventional PD-1/CTLA-4 therapies and investigational therapies. Botensilimab augments immune responses across a wide range of tumor types by priming and activating T cells, downregulating intratumoral regulatory T cells, activating myeloid cells and inducing long-term memory responses.

Approximately 1,200 patients have been treated with botensilimab and/or balstilimab in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials. Botensilimab alone, or in combination with Agenus’ investigational PD-1 antibody, balstilimab, has shown clinical responses across nine metastatic, late-line cancers. For more information about botensilimab trials, visit www.clinicaltrials.gov.

About Balstilimab (BAL)

Balstilimab is a novel, fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) designed to block PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) from interacting with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. It has been evaluated in more than 900 patients to date and has demonstrated clinical activity and a favorable tolerability profile in several tumor types.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the federal securities laws, including statements regarding its botensilimab and balstilimab programs, expected regulatory timelines and filings, and any other statements containing the words “may,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “hopes,” “intends,” “plans,” “forecasts,” “estimates,” “will,” “establish,” “potential,” “superiority,” “best in class,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, the factors described under the Risk Factors section of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2024, and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Agenus cautions investors not to place considerable reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this release. These statements speak only as of the date of this press release, and Agenus undertakes no obligation to update or revise the statements, other than to the extent required by law. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

____________________________
iPorter R, Bockorny B, Corr BR, et al. Botensilimab (Fc-enhanced anti–CTLA-4 antibody) plus balstilimab (anti–PD-1 antibody) in patients with treatment-refractory ovarian cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2025;13(12)e:013222. doi:10.1136/jitc-2025-013222.

iiSiegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74:12–49.

iiiSung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49.

ivDisis ML, Taylor MH, Kelly K, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Avelumab for Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Ovarian Cancer: Phase 1b Results From the JAVELIN Solid Tumor Trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:393–401.

vMatulonis UA, Shapira-Frommer R, Santin AD, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-100 study. Ann Oncol 2019;30:1080–7.

Contacts

Investors
917-362-1370 | investor@agenusbio.com

Media
781-674-4422 | communications@agenusbio.com

Market Opportunity
DeepBook Logo
DeepBook Price(DEEP)
$0.035485
$0.035485$0.035485
-1.63%
USD
DeepBook (DEEP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer […] The post Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 01:13
The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

PANews reported on December 31 that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) plans to study in 2026 whether certain crypto assets can be classified as cash
Share
PANews2025/12/31 16:50