Mastercard is in late-stage talks to buy blockchain infrastructure firm Zero Hash for between $1.5 billion and $2 billion as the payments giant moves to [...]Mastercard is in late-stage talks to buy blockchain infrastructure firm Zero Hash for between $1.5 billion and $2 billion as the payments giant moves to [...]

Coinbase Says Banks’ Stablecoin Fears ‘Ignore Reality,’ Dismisses Deposit Drain Concerns

2025/10/30 17:04
4 min read

Coinbase has accused US banks of ignoring reality by claiming stablecoins will drain deposits and constrain their ability to lend, arguing that they expand the dollar’s global reach.

Policy chief Faryar Shirzad said on X that most stablecoin demand comes from outside the US, boosting dollar dominance rather than competing with domestic lenders.

“The ‘stablecoins will destroy bank lending’ narrative ignores reality,” Shirzad said. “Treating stablecoins as a threat misreads the moment: they strengthen the dollar’s global role and unlock competitive advantages that the US shouldn’t constrain.”

US banks have repeatedly expressed concerns that yield-bearing stablecoins will lead to large outflows from the traditional financial system, threatening lending that powers economic growth. They are urging Congress to clamp down on services that offer yields on stablecoins.

Concerns intensified after US President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law in July, providing regulatory clarity over their status and thus making them a more imminent threat to traditional banks.

Their market capitalization has since surged to more than $300 billion.

Stablecoin market cap (Source: DefiLlama)

The GENIUS Act currently bans stablecoin issuers from offering yields to token holders directly, but it does not extend this prohibition to third parties or affiliates. As such, banking groups in the US are urging Congress to address this “loophole,” especially since several stablecoins currently offer much better yields than the average savings account in the US. 

Banks Have More Than Enough Liquidity For Lending

In his post, Shirzad shared a snippet of a recent report published by Coinbase Institute. 

Coinbase said in the report that banks currently hold “vast reserves and safe assets,” adding that these institutions hold $3 trillion in balances at the Federal Reserve and “additional trillions” in Treasuries. 

As such, the exchange said that banks have “excess liquidity” that is more than “what is needed for current lending activity.” 

“If banks can absorb such reserves without impairing credit supply, it is inconsistent to claim that stablecoin growth poses a systemic threat,” Coinbase said. 

Competition For Better Payments Is A Feature, Not A Flaw

Coinbase also argued in its report that competition in the payments space will be beneficial for users, and that banks should rather take part in the competition instead of trying to outright stall stablecoin progress. 

“If stablecoins ever did attract substantial balances from US depositors, it would mean they had succeeded in offering faster, cheaper, and more programmable payments,” Coinbase said, adding that would be a “success” and not a risk. 

The firm drew parallels between banks’ concerns with stablecoins and worries around the rise of money market funds (MMFs) in the 1980s. 

“When MMFs offered market yields and near-instant access, consumers shifted deposits away from low-rate accounts,” the exchange said. Instead of destabilizing the financial system, MMFs “became a permanent and valuable part of the financial ecosystem,” it said. 

“Stablecoins represent a similar kind of competitive pressure,” Coinbase said. The firm said the average interest rate paid by US savings accounts is 0.5%, even while short-term Treasury yields offer approximately 5%. This, according to Coinbase, “reflects inertia, frictions, and lack of alternatives.” 

Like MMFs, stablecoins challenge incumbents ”not by increasing risk but by offering a better deal to consumers and businesses,” it said. 

Some TradFi Firms Have Started Moving In On Stablecoins

TradFi firms also are moving into the stablecoin market. Payments giant Visa has recently announced that it will add support for four stablecoins across four blockchains to its existing offering, citing strong growth for its stablecoin products in the past year. 

Citi and several major banks have also started exploring stablecoins, while reports suggest that Mastercard is in advanced talks to acquire the stablecoin infrastructure firm Zero Hash. 

Legacy firm Western Union also announced earlier this week that it will deploy its own stablecoin on the Solana blockchain through Anchorage Digital. 

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Solid growth outlook supports Ringgit – Standard Chartered

Solid growth outlook supports Ringgit – Standard Chartered

The post Solid growth outlook supports Ringgit – Standard Chartered appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Standard Chartered’s Edward Lee and Jonathan Koh highlight
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/14 03:14
IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge!

IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge!

The post IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 18:00 Discover why BlockDAG’s upcoming Awakening Testnet launch makes it the best crypto to buy today as Story (IP) price jumps to $11.75 and Hyperliquid hits new highs. Recent crypto market numbers show strength but also some limits. The Story (IP) price jump has been sharp, fueled by big buybacks and speculation, yet critics point out that revenue still lags far behind its valuation. The Hyperliquid (HYPE) price looks solid around the mid-$50s after a new all-time high, but questions remain about sustainability once the hype around USDH proposals cools down. So the obvious question is: why chase coins that are either stretched thin or at risk of retracing when you could back a network that’s already proving itself on the ground? That’s where BlockDAG comes in. While other chains are stuck dealing with validator congestion or outages, BlockDAG’s upcoming Awakening Testnet will be stress-testing its EVM-compatible smart chain with real miners before listing. For anyone looking for the best crypto coin to buy, the choice between waiting on fixes or joining live progress feels like an easy one. BlockDAG: Smart Chain Running Before Launch Ethereum continues to wrestle with gas congestion, and Solana is still known for network freezes, yet BlockDAG is already showing a different picture. Its upcoming Awakening Testnet, set to launch on September 25, isn’t just a demo; it’s a live rollout where the chain’s base protocols are being stress-tested with miners connected globally. EVM compatibility is active, account abstraction is built in, and tools like updated vesting contracts and Stratum integration are already functional. Instead of waiting for fixes like other networks, BlockDAG is proving its infrastructure in real time. What makes this even more important is that the technology is operational before the coin even hits exchanges. That…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:32
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00