Ryne Miller: CFTC shifts to regulation by regulation, digital assets now classified as commodities, and the need for US perpetuals on equities

CFTC’s shift to structured regulation could transform digital asset governance and enhance market transparency.

Key Takeaways

The CFTC is shifting from a strategy of regulation by enforcement to regulation by regulation, indicating a more structured approach.
Public comments are being sought by the CFTC on prediction markets, suggesting a move towards more inclusive rule-making.
Major digital assets being categorized as commodities provide regulatory certainty, aiding market participants in product development and capital allocation.
Chairman Selig’s agenda may lead to more substantive rulemakings from the CFTC, reflecting a shift in agency productivity.
The CFTC’s funding model limits its capacity, impacting its ability to meet market demands effectively.
The US must develop a parallel product for perpetuals on equities to stay competitive in the global market.
Dual registration of entities poses significant regulatory challenges, affecting hedge funds and asset managers.
Joint regulation by the SEC and CFTC could enhance oversight of prediction markets, offering a collaborative regulatory approach.
Certain prediction market bets, especially those related to public company performance, may fall under SEC jurisdiction.
Existing laws on the use of confidential information in trading are likely to extend to prediction markets, ensuring regulatory compliance.
The CFTC is signaling potential rule-making on prediction markets, indicating a proactive regulatory stance.
The dual registration issue highlights inefficiencies in the current regulatory framework for financial entities.
The CFTC’s transition to regulation by regulation could lead to more predictable and transparent governance of digital assets.
The need for a US parallel product for perpetuals on equities underscores the importance of innovation in regulatory adaptation.
Joint SEC and CFTC regulation could resolve historical tensions and improve market oversight.

Guest intro

Ryne Miller is a partner in Morrison Foerster’s Financial Services Group, advising global trading and markets businesses. He previously served as General Counsel of FTX US, where he played a crucial role responding to the company’s collapse in November 2022 after discovering an 8 billion to 10 billion dollar liquidity hole in customer deposits. Miller also has prior experience as a CFTC staffer, bringing deep regulatory expertise to discussions on crypto policy and enforcement.

The CFTC’s evolving regulatory approach

The CFTC is moving from regulation by enforcement to a more structured regulation by regulation strategy.
— Ryne Miller
This shift could lead to more predictable governance of digital assets.
The CFTC is signaling potential rule-making on prediction markets and seeking public comments.
— Ryne Miller
This proactive approach involves engaging with the market to shape future regulations.
Public comments are crucial for the CFTC to develop inclusive and effective rules.
The transition reflects a significant change in regulatory strategy with potential market impacts.

Implications of digital assets as commodities

Most major digital assets are now categorized as commodities, providing regulatory certainty.
— Ryne Miller
This categorization aids in product development and capital allocation with certainty in the US.
Regulatory clarity can influence market dynamics and investment strategies.
The classification of digital assets as commodities marks a shift towards clearer regulatory frameworks.
This move could encourage innovation and growth within the digital asset market.
Market participants can now operate with a higher degree of confidence.
The commodity categorization aligns with global regulatory trends for digital assets.

Chairman Selig’s agenda and CFTC productivity

Chairman Selig’s agenda may lead to more substantive rulemakings from the CFTC.
— Ryne Miller
This reflects a shift in agency productivity based on leadership changes.
Increased rulemaking could enhance regulatory clarity and market stability.
The CFTC’s historical context of rulemaking output is significant in understanding this shift.
Leadership changes often bring about new regulatory priorities and strategies.
Enhanced productivity could lead to more frequent and impactful regulatory updates.
The CFTC’s agenda under Chairman Selig indicates a commitment to effective governance.

Funding challenges and operational capacity

The CFTC’s funding model limits its staffing and operational capacity.
— Ryne Miller
This impacts the CFTC’s ability to respond to market needs effectively.
There is ongoing debate about whether the CFTC should switch to a fee model.
Funding limitations pose structural challenges in fulfilling the CFTC’s regulatory role.
Adequate funding is crucial for the CFTC to maintain its operational effectiveness.
The CFTC’s capacity constraints highlight the need for sustainable funding solutions.
Addressing funding challenges could enhance the agency’s regulatory capabilities.

The need for US regulatory adaptation

The US must develop a parallel product for perpetuals on equities to remain competitive.
— Ryne Miller
This highlights a critical need for regulatory adaptation in the US.
Perpetuals are significant in trading, necessitating regulatory innovation.
The US’s ability to compete globally depends on its regulatory agility.
Developing parallel products is essential for maintaining market competitiveness.
Regulatory adaptation is crucial for the US to keep pace with global market developments.
The focus on perpetuals underscores the importance of forward-thinking regulation.

Regulatory challenges for dual registered entities

Dual registration creates significant regulatory challenges for hedge funds and asset managers.
— Ryne Miller
This affects the efficiency and feasibility of financial products.
Different examination programs for the same regulation create operational inefficiencies.
Harmonizing regulatory frameworks could alleviate challenges for dual registered entities.
The issue highlights inefficiencies in the current regulatory landscape.
Addressing dual registration challenges is crucial for regulatory effectiveness.
Streamlining regulatory processes could enhance market efficiency and innovation.

Potential benefits of joint SEC and CFTC regulation

Joint regulation by the SEC and CFTC could lead to better oversight of prediction markets.
— Ryne Miller
This collaborative approach could improve market operations and regulatory clarity.
Historical tensions between the SEC and CFTC could be resolved through joint efforts.
Joint regulation could enhance oversight and reduce regulatory gaps.
Collaboration between agencies is crucial for effective market governance.
The potential for joint regulation reflects a strategic viewpoint on improving oversight.
Enhanced collaboration could lead to more comprehensive and effective regulation.

SEC jurisdiction over certain prediction market bets

Certain prediction market bets may fall under SEC jurisdiction.
— Ryne Miller
This includes bets related to public company performance and transactions.
Understanding the regulatory frameworks governing prediction markets is crucial.
The SEC’s jurisdiction highlights the complexities of regulating prediction markets.
Clear regulatory guidelines are needed for prediction markets to ensure compliance.
The intersection of prediction markets and SEC oversight reflects regulatory intricacies.
Ensuring proper jurisdictional alignment is key for effective market regulation.

Existing laws and prediction markets

Existing laws on confidential information in trading will likely extend to prediction markets.
— Ryne Miller
This indicates a trend towards stricter oversight in emerging markets.
Insider trading laws are crucial for maintaining market integrity and fairness.
Extending existing regulations to prediction markets ensures a level playing field.
Regulatory frameworks must adapt to address new market practices effectively.
The application of existing laws to prediction markets highlights regulatory foresight.
Ensuring compliance with existing laws is essential for the credibility of prediction markets.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

CFTC’s shift to structured regulation could transform digital asset governance and enhance market transparency.

Key Takeaways

The CFTC is shifting from a strategy of regulation by enforcement to regulation by regulation, indicating a more structured approach.
Public comments are being sought by the CFTC on prediction markets, suggesting a move towards more inclusive rule-making.
Major digital assets being categorized as commodities provide regulatory certainty, aiding market participants in product development and capital allocation.
Chairman Selig’s agenda may lead to more substantive rulemakings from the CFTC, reflecting a shift in agency productivity.
The CFTC’s funding model limits its capacity, impacting its ability to meet market demands effectively.
The US must develop a parallel product for perpetuals on equities to stay competitive in the global market.
Dual registration of entities poses significant regulatory challenges, affecting hedge funds and asset managers.
Joint regulation by the SEC and CFTC could enhance oversight of prediction markets, offering a collaborative regulatory approach.
Certain prediction market bets, especially those related to public company performance, may fall under SEC jurisdiction.
Existing laws on the use of confidential information in trading are likely to extend to prediction markets, ensuring regulatory compliance.
The CFTC is signaling potential rule-making on prediction markets, indicating a proactive regulatory stance.
The dual registration issue highlights inefficiencies in the current regulatory framework for financial entities.
The CFTC’s transition to regulation by regulation could lead to more predictable and transparent governance of digital assets.
The need for a US parallel product for perpetuals on equities underscores the importance of innovation in regulatory adaptation.
Joint SEC and CFTC regulation could resolve historical tensions and improve market oversight.

Guest intro

The CFTC’s evolving regulatory approach

The CFTC is moving from regulation by enforcement to a more structured regulation by regulation strategy.
— Ryne Miller
This shift could lead to more predictable governance of digital assets.
The CFTC is signaling potential rule-making on prediction markets and seeking public comments.
— Ryne Miller
This proactive approach involves engaging with the market to shape future regulations.
Public comments are crucial for the CFTC to develop inclusive and effective rules.
The transition reflects a significant change in regulatory strategy with potential market impacts.

Implications of digital assets as commodities

Most major digital assets are now categorized as commodities, providing regulatory certainty.
— Ryne Miller
This categorization aids in product development and capital allocation with certainty in the US.
Regulatory clarity can influence market dynamics and investment strategies.
The classification of digital assets as commodities marks a shift towards clearer regulatory frameworks.
This move could encourage innovation and growth within the digital asset market.
Market participants can now operate with a higher degree of confidence.
The commodity categorization aligns with global regulatory trends for digital assets.

Chairman Selig’s agenda and CFTC productivity

Chairman Selig’s agenda may lead to more substantive rulemakings from the CFTC.
— Ryne Miller
This reflects a shift in agency productivity based on leadership changes.
Increased rulemaking could enhance regulatory clarity and market stability.
The CFTC’s historical context of rulemaking output is significant in understanding this shift.
Leadership changes often bring about new regulatory priorities and strategies.
Enhanced productivity could lead to more frequent and impactful regulatory updates.
The CFTC’s agenda under Chairman Selig indicates a commitment to effective governance.

Funding challenges and operational capacity

The CFTC’s funding model limits its staffing and operational capacity.
— Ryne Miller
This impacts the CFTC’s ability to respond to market needs effectively.
There is ongoing debate about whether the CFTC should switch to a fee model.
Funding limitations pose structural challenges in fulfilling the CFTC’s regulatory role.
Adequate funding is crucial for the CFTC to maintain its operational effectiveness.
The CFTC’s capacity constraints highlight the need for sustainable funding solutions.
Addressing funding challenges could enhance the agency’s regulatory capabilities.

The need for US regulatory adaptation

The US must develop a parallel product for perpetuals on equities to remain competitive.
— Ryne Miller
This highlights a critical need for regulatory adaptation in the US.
Perpetuals are significant in trading, necessitating regulatory innovation.
The US’s ability to compete globally depends on its regulatory agility.
Developing parallel products is essential for maintaining market competitiveness.
Regulatory adaptation is crucial for the US to keep pace with global market developments.
The focus on perpetuals underscores the importance of forward-thinking regulation.

Regulatory challenges for dual registered entities

Dual registration creates significant regulatory challenges for hedge funds and asset managers.
— Ryne Miller
This affects the efficiency and feasibility of financial products.
Different examination programs for the same regulation create operational inefficiencies.
Harmonizing regulatory frameworks could alleviate challenges for dual registered entities.
The issue highlights inefficiencies in the current regulatory landscape.
Addressing dual registration challenges is crucial for regulatory effectiveness.
Streamlining regulatory processes could enhance market efficiency and innovation.

Potential benefits of joint SEC and CFTC regulation

Joint regulation by the SEC and CFTC could lead to better oversight of prediction markets.
— Ryne Miller
This collaborative approach could improve market operations and regulatory clarity.
Historical tensions between the SEC and CFTC could be resolved through joint efforts.
Joint regulation could enhance oversight and reduce regulatory gaps.
Collaboration between agencies is crucial for effective market governance.
The potential for joint regulation reflects a strategic viewpoint on improving oversight.
Enhanced collaboration could lead to more comprehensive and effective regulation.

SEC jurisdiction over certain prediction market bets

Certain prediction market bets may fall under SEC jurisdiction.
— Ryne Miller
This includes bets related to public company performance and transactions.
Understanding the regulatory frameworks governing prediction markets is crucial.
The SEC’s jurisdiction highlights the complexities of regulating prediction markets.
Clear regulatory guidelines are needed for prediction markets to ensure compliance.
The intersection of prediction markets and SEC oversight reflects regulatory intricacies.
Ensuring proper jurisdictional alignment is key for effective market regulation.

Existing laws and prediction markets

Existing laws on confidential information in trading will likely extend to prediction markets.
— Ryne Miller
This indicates a trend towards stricter oversight in emerging markets.
Insider trading laws are crucial for maintaining market integrity and fairness.
Extending existing regulations to prediction markets ensures a level playing field.
Regulatory frameworks must adapt to address new market practices effectively.
The application of existing laws to prediction markets highlights regulatory foresight.
Ensuring compliance with existing laws is essential for the credibility of prediction markets.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Loading more articles…

You’ve reached the end

Add us on Google

`;
}

function createMobileArticle(article) {
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const authorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `

${captionHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${createSocialShare()}

${authorHtml}
${displayDate}

${article.content}

${article.isPressRelease ? ” : article.isSponsored ? `

Disclosure: This is sponsored content. It does not represent Crypto Briefing’s editorial views. For more information, see our Editorial Policy.

` : `

Disclosure: This article was edited by ${article.editor}. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

`;
}

function createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml) {
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const categoriesHtml = article.categories.map((cat, i) => {
const separator = i < article.categories.length – 1 ? ‘|‘ : ”;
return `${cat}${separator}`;
}).join(”);
const desktopAuthorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `

${categoriesHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${desktopAuthorHtml}
${displayDate}
${createSocialShare()}

${captionHtml}

${article.content}
${article.isPressRelease ? ” : article.isSponsored ? `

Disclosure: This is sponsored content. It does not represent Crypto Briefing’s editorial views. For more information, see our Editorial Policy.

` : `

Disclosure: This article was edited by ${article.editor}. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

`;
}

function loadMoreArticles() {
if (isLoading || !hasMore) return;

isLoading = true;
loadingText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);

// Build form data for AJAX request
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append(‘action’, ‘cb_lovable_load_more’);
formData.append(‘current_post_id’, lastLoadedPostId);
formData.append(‘primary_cat_id’, primaryCatId);
formData.append(‘before_date’, lastLoadedDate);
formData.append(‘loaded_ids’, loadedPostIds.join(‘,’));

fetch(ajaxUrl, {
method: ‘POST’,
body: formData
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);

if (data.success && data.has_more && data.article) {
const article = data.article;
const sidebarAdHtml = data.sidebar_ad_html || ”;

// Check for duplicates
if (loadedPostIds.includes(article.id)) {
console.log(‘Duplicate article detected, skipping:’, article.id);
// Update pagination vars and try again
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
loadMoreArticles();
return;
}

// Add to mobile container
mobileContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createMobileArticle(article));

// Add to desktop container with fresh ad HTML
desktopContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml));

// Update tracking variables
loadedPostIds.push(article.id);
lastLoadedPostId = article.id;
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;

// Execute any inline scripts in the new content (for ads)
const newArticle = desktopContainer.querySelector(`article[data-article-id=”${article.id}”]`);
if (newArticle) {
const scripts = newArticle.querySelectorAll(‘script’);
scripts.forEach(script => {
const newScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
if (script.src) {
newScript.src = script.src;
} else {
newScript.textContent = script.textContent;
}
document.body.appendChild(newScript);
});
}

// Trigger Ad Inserter if available
if (typeof ai_check_and_insert_block === ‘function’) {
ai_check_and_insert_block();
}

// Trigger Google Publisher Tag refresh if available
if (typeof googletag !== ‘undefined’ && googletag.pubads) {
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.pubads().refresh();
});
}

} else if (data.success && !data.has_more) {
hasMore = false;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
} else if (!data.success) {
console.error(‘AJAX error:’, data.error);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
}
})
.catch(error => {
console.error(‘Fetch error:’, error);
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
});
}

// Set up IntersectionObserver
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function(entries) {
if (entries[0].isIntersecting) {
loadMoreArticles();
}
}, { threshold: 0.1 });

observer.observe(loadingTrigger);
})();

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/ryne-miller-cftc-shifts-to-regulation-by-regulation-digital-assets-now-classified-as-commodities-and-the-need-for-us-perpetuals-on-equities-unchained/