ExchangeDEX+
Buy CryptoMarketsSpotFuturesGOLDEarnEvent Center
More
TLDR Sam Altman responded to Elon Musk’s criticism of ChatGPT, accusing him of hypocrisy over the safety of Tesla’s Autopilot. Musk warned against using ChatGPTTLDR Sam Altman responded to Elon Musk’s criticism of ChatGPT, accusing him of hypocrisy over the safety of Tesla’s Autopilot. Musk warned against using ChatGPT

Tesla Autopilot and ChatGPT: Altman vs. Musk in Heated Online Spat

Author: CoincentralSource: Coincentral
2026/01/22 00:57
Dogelon Mars
ELON$0.00000003882-1.84%

TLDR

  • Sam Altman responded to Elon Musk’s criticism of ChatGPT, accusing him of hypocrisy over the safety of Tesla’s Autopilot.
  • Musk warned against using ChatGPT, claiming it was linked to multiple deaths, but Altman pointed out Musk’s own issues with Tesla’s safety.
  • Altman highlighted the contradiction in Musk’s statements, criticizing his stance on AI safety and questioning Tesla’s Autopilot technology.
  • OpenAI faces multiple lawsuits related to ChatGPT’s impact on users’ mental health, including claims linked to suicides and delusions.
  • The dispute between Altman and Musk underscores their long-standing tensions since Musk’s departure from OpenAI in 2018.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has publicly responded to Elon Musk’s criticism of ChatGPT, the AI chatbot developed by OpenAI. Musk had linked the chatbot to several deaths, including suicides, prompting Altman to address the issue directly. The two tech giants exchanged barbs on social media, with Altman accusing Musk of hypocrisy over his criticism of AI technologies.

Altman Criticizes Musk’s Double Standards on ChatGPT

Altman fired back at Musk’s statement about ChatGPT, where the Tesla CEO warned against letting loved ones use the AI. Musk had claimed that the chatbot was linked to several deaths, including suicides.

The clash became more heated as Altman pointed out that Musk had failed to address the fatal crashes related to Tesla’s Autopilot. “More than 50 people have died in crashes linked to Tesla’s Autopilot,” Altman said. He questioned Musk’s own decisions on AI safety, particularly regarding Tesla’s technology, suggesting it was far from being a safe product to release.

The tension between Altman and Musk comes as both companies are under increased scrutiny regarding the safety of their AI technologies. OpenAI has been facing lawsuits related to its chatbot’s potential impact on users’ mental health. Some of these lawsuits claim that ChatGPT contributed to suicides and mental health issues. Altman stated that OpenAI continues to work on improving its safety measures, despite the tragic incidents.

In contrast, Tesla has been dealing with legal challenges tied to its Autopilot feature. Reports have shown that several fatal accidents were associated with the system, raising questions about the company’s handling of safety features. Musk’s refusal to comment on these reports only adds to the growing controversy surrounding his company’s AI-driven technology.

Altman and Musk’s Long History of Tension

The rivalry between Sam Altman and Elon Musk traces back to the early days of OpenAI. Musk was one of the co-founders of the AI organization but stepped down from its board in 2018. Since then, Musk has criticized OpenAI, accusing the organization of abandoning its nonprofit roots. He believes OpenAI has shifted to become a profit-driven entity aligned with Microsoft, which has created tension between the two companies.

This latest public dispute adds another chapter to their strained relationship. Musk has previously filed lawsuits against OpenAI, seeking billions in damages over the alleged unfair competition and trade secret theft. However, both companies continue to move forward with their respective AI technologies despite the ongoing legal and public disputes.

The post Tesla Autopilot and ChatGPT: Altman vs. Musk in Heated Online Spat appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Dogelon Mars Logo
Dogelon Mars Price(ELON)
$0.00000003882
$0.00000003882$0.00000003882
+0.33%
USD
Dogelon Mars (ELON) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs

The post Shanghai residents flock to sell gold as its price hit record highs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold surged over the $5,500-per-ounce milestone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 01:48
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40