Silver’s parabolic run toward $119 pits bubble warnings against structural deficits, with crypto traders watching for a classic blow-off or a lasting squeeze. SilverSilver’s parabolic run toward $119 pits bubble warnings against structural deficits, with crypto traders watching for a classic blow-off or a lasting squeeze. Silver

Silver traders face make-or-break test at $115–$120 an ounce, where does crypto stand?

Silver’s parabolic run toward $119 pits bubble warnings against structural deficits, with crypto traders watching for a classic blow-off or a lasting squeeze.

Summary
  • Silver has ripped over 60% this month and about 275% in a year, echoing past blow-offs as Kolanovic and Brandt flag speculative, meme-like excess.​
  • Citigroup still sees scope for a push toward $150, citing seven years of supply deficits, record industrial demand, Chinese export curbs and surging ETF volumes.​
  • Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana trade near cycle highs as macro-driven crypto desks study silver’s spike for clues about risk appetite and bubble dynamics.

Silver’s vertical climb to a record $119 an ounce has lit up terminals—and set off alarm bells from some of the market’s most battle‑scarred veterans. The metal has surged more than 60% in January and roughly 275% over the past year, its strongest monthly run since the Hunt brothers’ ill‑fated corner in 1979.​

A Blow‑Off Top, Or “Gold On Steroids”?

Former JPMorgan chief strategist Marko Kolanovic is openly calling time on the party. He warns that silver is “almost guaranteed to drop ~50% from these levels within a year or so,” describing the move as a speculative blow‑off driven by “momentum buying and meme‑style trading behavior rather than durable fundamentals.” Veteran trader Peter Brandt points out that “nearly two years of world production traded on world exchanges—over 1.5 billion ounces,” the highest intensity of turnover since the day of the 2011 top.

Not everyone is running for the exits. Citigroup has hiked its near‑term target to $150 an ounce and characterizes silver as “gold squared” or “gold on steroids,” arguing that a mix of strong physical demand, speculative flows and thin liquidity can still drive prices higher. The iShares Silver Trust has already seen single‑session trading volumes approach $40 billion, nearly matching the SPDR S&P 500 ETF—a sign of how aggressively retail and macro money have piled in.

Structural Tightness Meets Bubble Risk

Bulls insist this is not a rerun of 1980. The market has logged seven consecutive years of supply deficits, while industrial demand hit record highs in 2025. Solar manufacturing alone is expected to consume 120–125 million ounces of silver in 2026, with electric vehicles adding 70–75 million ounces. China’s move to reclassify silver as a strategic material—and tighten export licenses from January 1—has further squeezed available supply.

Yet HSBC cautions that it is “unlikely that silver has become a new safe‑haven asset,” arguing that as prices “began to catch up with gold, momentum took over and retail investors joined in.” As Kolanovic notes, commodity bubbles “collide with physical reality” as high prices crush industrial demand, accelerate recycling and incentivize hedged supply.

Crypto Markets Watching Closely

This parabolic move comes as digital assets continue to trade as the purest expression of macro risk appetite. Bitcoin (BTC) is hovering around $88,235, with a 24‑hour high near $90,476 and a low near $87,549, on roughly $32.8B in dollar volumes. Ethereum (ETH) changes hands close to $2,953, with about $23.4B in 24‑hour turnover and spot quotes clustered in the $4,500–$4,600 band on major exchanges earlier this week. Solana trades around $192, up about 2.7% over the last 24 hours, with nearly $9.8B in volume.

For macro‑driven crypto traders, silver’s behavior looks uncomfortably familiar: a scarce asset, real policy risk, and a retail‑fueled chase into ever‑thinner liquidity. The question now is whether silver’s “gold on steroids” phase ends like a classic meme‑era blow‑off—or whether this time, the industrial squeeze and strategic stockpiling prove strong enough to keep the bubble from bursting on schedule.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Zaldy Co asks SC to halt graft reso

Zaldy Co asks SC to halt graft reso

FORMER Party-list Rep. Elizaldy “Zaldy” S. Co has filed a petition before the Supreme Court (SC) to halt an Ombudsman resolution that found probable cause to charge
Share
Bworldonline2026/01/29 21:08
FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33