There is no respite for the Bitcoin price as the Middle Eastern conflict enters day 3. Bitcoin is holding up for now, but if the strikes continue for the next fewThere is no respite for the Bitcoin price as the Middle Eastern conflict enters day 3. Bitcoin is holding up for now, but if the strikes continue for the next few

Bitcoin Continues Slide Below $66K as US/Israel/Iran Conflict Enters Day 3 – BTC TA March 2, 2026

2026/03/02 18:36
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

There is no respite for the Bitcoin price as the Middle Eastern conflict enters day 3. Bitcoin is holding up for now, but if the strikes continue for the next few days a potential pulling out of liquidity could force the king of cryptocurrencies into the next leg down of the bear market.

Lower high confirms downward slide

Source: TradingView

The channel that the $BTC price has been in since early February is continuing to extend sideways and slightly downward. A series of lower highs and lower lows was interrupted at the weekend, as a slightly higher low was recorded. However, this was undone by another lower high from the rebound.

For this current corrective phase, if that’s what it is, it will be very important for the bulls to hold the bottom of the channel, which is likely to correspond with the $62,800 horizontal support level.

A confirmed drop below here would probably send the price down past the $60,000 local low to around $55,000 - not far from the $53,000 measured move out of the bear flag.

Flag inclines in the wrong direction for bears

Source: TradingView

Moving out into the daily time frame it can be seen that if only the current channel was inclined upward instead of downward it would be a textbook bear flag and it would just be a case of waiting for a continuation of the bearish reversal.

As things stand, the channel is inclined downward, and therefore from a TA perspective the price is more likely to break to the upside than the downside. It just remains to be seen: is this a bottoming process that is playing out, or will one more leg to the downside lead to the full extent of this bear market?

Extension of falling wedge pattern?

Source: TradingView

Zooming out into the weekly time frame it can be noted that the huge falling wedge pattern can be extended out a lot further, which helps to enclose the recent price action. If this is indeed the right pattern, it would be expected that the price breaks out to the upside before getting to the bottom. 

Generally, the $BTC price breaks out of patterns like these about two thirds of the way along. This would perhaps suggest that $60,000 was the bottom. That said, it doesn’t mean that the price will just break out of the wedge and head higher straight away. Bitcoin bear markets tend to grind along the bottom for a few months first. Also, when all are thinking that the bottom is behind them, the price will come back down to make a double bottom. This has happened in every bear market so far.

$1 million and beyond, or zero?

If you are a Bitcoin investor, the main takeaway here is that a bottom is forming. It can take a lot longer for this process to complete, and it can be a bumpy ride, but if you have conviction you just need to wait it out.

For those who thought they had missed their chance to get into Bitcoin when the price was up at $126,000, we are now at around half of this. If Bitcoin continues to do what it’s been doing for the last 17 years it will just be a case of price averaging and remaining patient. 

As it has been said, Bitcoin is either going to $1 million and beyond, or it is going to zero. How the $BTC price reacts to this bear market could give us an idea of which particular scenario is more likely to play out.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$68,637.93
$68,637.93$68,637.93
-0.70%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

TLDR South Korea introduced new custody rules after police lost seized Bitcoin worth $1.4 million. The Finance Minister confirmed a full inspection of digital asset
Share
Coincentral2026/03/03 01:00
Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

The Justice Department filed an emergency motion at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday against the state of Michigan over its refusal to share voter rolls
Share
Alternet2026/03/03 01:25