TLDR: Gold dropped nearly 10% and silver 30% as margin hikes forced leveraged liquidations.  Kevin Warsh’s nomination strengthened the US dollar, pressuring metalsTLDR: Gold dropped nearly 10% and silver 30% as margin hikes forced leveraged liquidations.  Kevin Warsh’s nomination strengthened the US dollar, pressuring metals

Silver Dives 30% to $83 While Gold Falls 10% to $4,700 Amid Margin Hikes

TLDR:

  • Gold dropped nearly 10% and silver 30% as margin hikes forced leveraged liquidations. 
  • Kevin Warsh’s nomination strengthened the US dollar, pressuring metals prices sharply. 
  • Silver rebounded 8% after intraday lows, showing oversold conditions correcting. 
  • Market reset removed weak positions, offering opportunities for disciplined investors. 

Gold and silver continue to face sharp volatility. Gold is around $4,665 per ounce, and silver is near $79–$82 per ounce. After facing historic sell‑offs and forced liquidations, both metals remain well below recent record highs. 

The market is responding to heightened margin requirements and a stronger US dollar. Partial rebounds signal oversold conditions that are attracting renewed buying interest. 

Historic Volatility and Margin-Driven Liquidations

Gold and silver experienced extreme price swings, with gold reaching $5,600 and silver $122 before sharply falling. By Monday, gold traded near $4,700, while silver briefly touched $71 intraday, before bouncing into the $83–87 range.

The immediate catalyst was political: Kevin Warsh’s nomination as Federal Reserve Chair signaled tighter monetary policy. Warsh’s hawkish stance strengthened the US dollar, which increased costs for international buyers of precious metals.

Since gold and silver are priced in dollars, the stronger currency immediately suppressed demand, pressuring prices further. However, the main driver was structural leverage in futures markets amplified by abrupt margin increases.

CME Group raised margin requirements 33% for gold and 36% for silver, forcing traders to either provide capital or liquidate positions. Margin allows traders to control large positions with limited capital, but sudden hikes create urgent selling pressure.

Most leveraged traders could not meet requirements, sparking a cascade of forced selling and rapid price declines. Initial liquidations triggered margin calls for other traders, accelerating panic selling in the metals market.


Stop-loss orders were executed automatically, liquidity quickly vanished, and prices gapped lower than any routine correction. Silver dropped nearly 30% intraday, while gold fell close to 10%, showing how leverage amplified volatility far beyond fundamentals.

Recovery and Market Stabilization

By Monday afternoon, silver rebounded roughly 8%, and gold partially recovered, signaling oversold conditions correcting. Buyers returned once forced selling subsided, stabilizing prices and creating a firmer market foundation.

This rebound suggests weaker traders were removed, leaving stronger hands and more controlled trading dynamics. Fundamental factors supporting precious metals remain unchanged, including geopolitical tensions and currency concerns.

Institutional forecasts remain bullish, with gold projected to reach $6,300 by the end of 2026 according to major banks. The volatility event created buying opportunities for patient investors willing to enter markets at lower prices.

Higher margin requirements now reduce the likelihood of repeat forced liquidations in futures markets. This event effectively purged over-leveraged positions, resetting the market on a more stable footing.

Precious metals markets are gradually stabilizing, offering long-term confidence for disciplined investors watching for entry points.

The post Silver Dives 30% to $83 While Gold Falls 10% to $4,700 Amid Margin Hikes appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Price Analysis for February 2

XRP Price Analysis for February 2

The post XRP Price Analysis for February 2 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The market might have found a local bottom by now, but the rates of some coins keep
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/03 08:34
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Vitalik sold 493.1 ETH on the blockchain, bringing the total number of authorized ETH on the CoW Swap to 5000.

Vitalik sold 493.1 ETH on the blockchain, bringing the total number of authorized ETH on the CoW Swap to 5000.

PANews reported on February 3 that, according to Ember, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin sold 493.1 ETH on-chain via CoW Swap today, earning $1.16 million. Furthermore
Share
PANews2026/02/03 08:37