The post Gold Tops 2025 Returns as Bitcoin Ranks Weakest Asset appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold topped all major assets in 2025 while Bitcoin ranked lastThe post Gold Tops 2025 Returns as Bitcoin Ranks Weakest Asset appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold topped all major assets in 2025 while Bitcoin ranked last

Gold Tops 2025 Returns as Bitcoin Ranks Weakest Asset

  • Gold topped all major assets in 2025 while Bitcoin ranked last, marking a rare reversal in cross-asset performance trends.
  • Bitcoin’s 2025 decline exceeded 20% from its peak, meeting standard bear market thresholds by market definitions.
  • Sharp Q4 losses erased earlier 2025 gains, breaking Bitcoin’s historical four-year growth-and-decline cycle.

Gold emerged as the best major asset in 2025 while Bitcoin posted its weakest annual performance, marking a rare inversion in cross-asset returns and intensifying scrutiny around whether the digital asset has entered a formal bear phase.

According to market data cited by Charlie Bilello, gold finished 2025 with a gain of 64%, ranking as the top-performing major asset for the year. In contrast, Bitcoin closed the year down 6%, making it the weakest performer among major asset classes. Bilello noted that this marked the first calendar year on record in which gold outperformed Bitcoin, with Bitcoin ranking last, mirroring the inverse of conditions seen in 2013.

Bitcoin Drawdown Meets Bear Market Threshold

Bitcoin’s 2025 price action met the commonly used definition of a bear market. After reaching an all-time high of above $126,000 in October, Bitcoin declined by more than 20%, falling below $100,000. This combination of price decline, reduced momentum, and weaker sentiment placed the asset within bear-market territory by traditional market standards.

Historical context provided by Ξliézer Ndinga shows that Bitcoin has previously experienced two different categories of recessions. Cyclical bear markets averaged drawdowns of approximately 84% and lasted around two and a half years. 

In contrast, shorter-term bear markets averaged declines of nearly 36%, typically lasting about two months, with recoveries spanning roughly three months. Ndinga also noted that Bitcoin recorded the weakest performance among major asset classes in both 2018 and 2022.

Quarterly Data Shows 2025 Weakness

Data from CoinGlass shows that Bitcoin returned -23.07% in Q4 2025, which is below its historical Q4 average of +77.07% and median of +47.73%. This ranked as the second-worst fourth quarter on record, behind only Q4 2018. Ethereum also posted a Q4 decline of -28.28%, ranking as its fourth-worst year-end performance.

CryptoRank.io data further showed that 2025 closed with a 6.28% annual loss for Bitcoin, breaking its long-observed four-year growth and decline cycle. Heatmap analysis of quarterly returns from 2013 through early 2026 reveals that while crypto markets have historically concentrated gains in specific quarters, the gains earlier in 2025 were outweighed by losses in the final quarter.

Related: Tokenized Gold and Silver Outperform Bitcoin This Year as Safe-Haven Demand Increases

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/gold-tops-2025-returns-as-bitcoin-ranks-weakest-asset/

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.12576
$0.12576$0.12576
+0.13%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41